Turing Algorithms in Art

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Symposion Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/symposion20231012

Arnold Cusmariu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exemplifying with sculptures the author created, the article shows that ontological algorithms can yield aesthetic content, while epistemological algorithms can capture it. Bridging the gap between art and logic creates new and exciting aesthetic opportunities, allaying Henry Moore’s fears of ‘paralysis by analysis.’ On the flip side, appreciating all that algorithmic art has to offer poses intellectual challenges that run counter to subjectivist approaches to art and its education.

查看原文本刊更多论文

艺术中的图灵算法

本文以作者创作的雕塑为例，表明本体论算法可以产生美学内容，而认识论算法可以捕获美学内容。弥合艺术和逻辑之间的差距创造了新的和令人兴奋的美学机会，减轻了亨利·摩尔对“分析瘫痪”的恐惧。“另一方面，欣赏所有算法艺术所提供的知识挑战，与艺术及其教育的主观主义方法背道而驰。”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Symposion Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Symposion was published for the first time in 2003, as Symposion – Revistă de științe socio-umane (Symposion – A Journal of Humanities), with the purpose of providing a supportive space for academic communication, dialogue, and debate, both intra and interdisciplinary, for philosophical humanities and social and political sciences. Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences shares essentially the same purpose. Its main aim is to promote and provide open access to peer-reviewed, high quality contributions (articles, discussion notes, review essays or book reviews) in philosophy, other humanities, and social and political sciences connected with philosophy.