A Pharmacist-Assisted Initiative to Improve Chronic Pain Management and Reduce Opioid Use in Primary Care.

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i1.5265
Kailene Perry, Susan Ferron, Nathan Norquist, Deborah M Mullen
{"title":"A Pharmacist-Assisted Initiative to Improve Chronic Pain Management and Reduce Opioid Use in Primary Care.","authors":"Kailene Perry, Susan Ferron, Nathan Norquist, Deborah M Mullen","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i1.5265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>- Since publication of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, there have been growing concerns that providers, including those in primary care, are tapering opioids too quickly and without concomitant use of non-opioid strategies for pain, leading to inadequate pain management. As a result, in November 2022 the CDC published Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Pain, emphasizing the importance of creating comprehensive care plans for pain management and developing a consensual plan between provider and patient when tapering opioids. <b>Objective-</b>Determine the impact of a pharmacist-assisted approach aimed at helping primary care providers minimize opioid use while improving management of chronic, non-malignant pain (CNMP). <b>Methods</b> - This quality improvement project focused on one primary care provider partnering with a pharmacist to reassess the management of patients on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for CNMP. The intervention included a letter informing patients of the provider's intent, pharmacist outreach to intervention patients, and pharmacist development of a patient registry, updated regularly with clinical data, recommendations, and outcomes for the provider to reference throughout the project. The intervention group was compared to patients prescribed opioids for CNMP by the remaining providers at the clinic who did not engage in the quality initiative. <b>Results -</b> The intervention group had a mean effective daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) reduction of 73.7% (17.2% control) after 18 months and 60% of patients discontinued opioids (14.3% control). In a subset of patients with functional assessment scores, 93.3% were either improved or unchanged, despite a 62.5% decrease in their mean effective daily MME. In both groups, one patient transferred care to a new provider. <b>Conclusions</b> - With targeted recommendations and assistance from a pharmacist, a primary care provider can make significant progress in improving management of CNMP while reducing opioid prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i1.5265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background- Since publication of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, there have been growing concerns that providers, including those in primary care, are tapering opioids too quickly and without concomitant use of non-opioid strategies for pain, leading to inadequate pain management. As a result, in November 2022 the CDC published Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Pain, emphasizing the importance of creating comprehensive care plans for pain management and developing a consensual plan between provider and patient when tapering opioids. Objective-Determine the impact of a pharmacist-assisted approach aimed at helping primary care providers minimize opioid use while improving management of chronic, non-malignant pain (CNMP). Methods - This quality improvement project focused on one primary care provider partnering with a pharmacist to reassess the management of patients on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for CNMP. The intervention included a letter informing patients of the provider's intent, pharmacist outreach to intervention patients, and pharmacist development of a patient registry, updated regularly with clinical data, recommendations, and outcomes for the provider to reference throughout the project. The intervention group was compared to patients prescribed opioids for CNMP by the remaining providers at the clinic who did not engage in the quality initiative. Results - The intervention group had a mean effective daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) reduction of 73.7% (17.2% control) after 18 months and 60% of patients discontinued opioids (14.3% control). In a subset of patients with functional assessment scores, 93.3% were either improved or unchanged, despite a 62.5% decrease in their mean effective daily MME. In both groups, one patient transferred care to a new provider. Conclusions - With targeted recommendations and assistance from a pharmacist, a primary care provider can make significant progress in improving management of CNMP while reducing opioid prescribing.

在初级保健中改善慢性疼痛管理和减少阿片类药物使用的药剂师协助倡议。
背景-自2016年CDC慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南发布以来,越来越多的人担心,包括初级保健提供者在内的提供者过快地减少阿片类药物的使用,并且没有同时使用非阿片类药物治疗疼痛,导致疼痛管理不足。因此,美国疾病控制与预防中心于2022年11月发布了《处方阿片类药物治疗疼痛的临床实践指南》,强调了为疼痛管理制定全面护理计划的重要性,并在逐渐减少阿片类药物时,在提供者和患者之间制定双方同意的计划。目的:确定药剂师辅助方法的影响,旨在帮助初级保健提供者减少阿片类药物的使用,同时改善慢性非恶性疼痛(CNMP)的管理。方法:本质量改进项目侧重于一名初级保健提供者与一名药剂师合作,重新评估CNMP患者长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)的管理。干预包括一封告知患者提供者意图的信,药剂师与干预患者的联系,药剂师制定患者登记册,定期更新临床数据、建议和结果,供提供者在整个项目中参考。将干预组与未参与质量倡议的诊所剩余提供者开具的用于CNMP的阿片类药物处方患者进行比较。结果-干预组18个月后平均有效每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)减少73.7%(对照组17.2%),60%的患者停用阿片类药物(对照组14.3%)。在功能评估评分的患者亚组中,93.3%的患者改善或保持不变,尽管他们的平均每日有效mme下降了62.5%。在两组中,一名患者将护理转移到新的提供者。结论:在有针对性的建议和药剂师的协助下,初级保健提供者可以在减少阿片类药物处方的同时,在改善CNMP管理方面取得重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信