On the Geometry of Speciesist Policing: The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Animal Cruelty Data

IF 1.8 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Beirne, M. Lynch
{"title":"On the Geometry of Speciesist Policing: The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Animal Cruelty Data","authors":"P. Beirne, M. Lynch","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.2631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contests the animal cruelty statistics newly collected and publicized in the US by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In what follows, we (1) outline the inclusion of animal cruelty in the FBI’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), 2016–2020; (2) analyze trends in animal cruelty cases reported in NIBRS; (3) identify key data validity, methodological and theoretical problems in NIBRS, especially with the FBI’s attempt to generate knowledge of the link between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence; and (4) juxtapose the FBI’s circumscribed concept of animal cruelty with the much more inclusive circle of compassion advanced by nonspeciesist and green criminology. We challenge illusions that the criminalization of animal cruelty is driven by a logic of benign inevitability, and ponder how the extension of compassion to a few favored species coexists with and even engenders de-civilizing countertrends, such as the immense abuse that occurs worldwide in the animal industrial complex. Therefore, we issue a call for the development of a nonspeciesist research program, both monocultural and cross-cultural, into the dynamics of the policing and surveillance of animal cruelty and animal abuse in a broad range of societies.","PeriodicalId":51781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article contests the animal cruelty statistics newly collected and publicized in the US by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In what follows, we (1) outline the inclusion of animal cruelty in the FBI’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), 2016–2020; (2) analyze trends in animal cruelty cases reported in NIBRS; (3) identify key data validity, methodological and theoretical problems in NIBRS, especially with the FBI’s attempt to generate knowledge of the link between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence; and (4) juxtapose the FBI’s circumscribed concept of animal cruelty with the much more inclusive circle of compassion advanced by nonspeciesist and green criminology. We challenge illusions that the criminalization of animal cruelty is driven by a logic of benign inevitability, and ponder how the extension of compassion to a few favored species coexists with and even engenders de-civilizing countertrends, such as the immense abuse that occurs worldwide in the animal industrial complex. Therefore, we issue a call for the development of a nonspeciesist research program, both monocultural and cross-cultural, into the dynamics of the policing and surveillance of animal cruelty and animal abuse in a broad range of societies.
论物种主义警务的几何学:美国联邦调查局的动物虐待数据
本文对美国联邦调查局(FBI)最新收集和公布的虐待动物统计数据提出了质疑。在以下内容中,我们(1)概述了2016-2020年联邦调查局国家事件报告系统(NIBRS)中对动物虐待的纳入;(2)分析NIBRS报告的虐待动物案件趋势;(3)识别NIBRS中关键数据的有效性、方法和理论问题,特别是联邦调查局试图建立动物虐待与人际暴力之间联系的知识;(4)将联邦调查局狭隘的虐待动物概念与非物种主义者和绿色犯罪学提出的更包容的同情圈并置。我们挑战这样一种错觉,即对虐待动物的定罪是由一种良性的必然性逻辑所驱动的,并思考对少数受青睐物种的同情是如何与反文明趋势共存的,甚至会产生反文明趋势,比如世界范围内动物工业综合体中发生的大规模虐待。因此,我们呼吁发展一个非物种主义的研究项目,包括单一文化和跨文化的,在广泛的社会范围内对动物虐待和动物虐待的警务和监督的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信