Irresistible joys and discouraging pitfalls in diagnosing personality disorders.

M. Gitlin
{"title":"Irresistible joys and discouraging pitfalls in diagnosing personality disorders.","authors":"M. Gitlin","doi":"10.1136/EWJM.176.3.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We humans seem to have an inherent urge to describe and label personalitiesin individuals we meet in everyday life, both professionally and personally.Unfortunately, neither lay descriptors nor psychiatric diagnoses easilycapture the sense we often have of others. In fact, describing andcategorizing personality and personality disorders have been among the weakestlinks in psychiatric nosology since the introduction of the Diagnostic andStatistical Manuals of Mental Disorders (DSMs). Even with the atheoretic,primarily descriptive approaches of DSM-III (published in 1980),DSM-III-R, andDSM-IV,1the section on personality disorders is the most problematic. Still, theinherent attraction of personality labeling is often too great to resist. \n \nIn his essay, Walling uses the descriptions of Achilles' behaviors andpersonality traits in The Iliad to diagnose him according toDSM-IV criteria. Although the author selects passages from the textthat are consistent with his conclusion that Achilles had antisocialpersonality disorder, we should view this conclusion with great cautionbecause it illustrates some of the pitfalls of personality diagnoses. \n \nA personality disorder is an enduring and stable pattern of innerexperience and behavior that deviates markedly from cultural expectations, ispervasive and inflexible, begins in early adolescence or early adulthood, andleads to distress andimpairment.1 Becausepersonality disorders are longitudinal and stable, diagnoses based oncross-sectional examinations are fraught with difficulties. Thus, Achilles mayhave thought and acted as described in The Iliad and noted byWalling, but what do we know about his patterns of behavior throughout hislife? The DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder requiresymptoms of conduct disorder (similar to adult antisocial behaviors) beforeage 15. Was Achilles a destructive, aggressive, deceitful child or adolescent?Without this information, it is impossible to make an accurate diagnosis. \n \nIn addition, diagnoses of personality disorders can be made only byexamining the individual's behavior in the context of his culture. AlthoughWalling describes some examples of Achilles' behavior that seem at variancewith his cultural norm, without a fuller knowledge of the culture, suchinterpretations are suspect. \n \nAn explicit rule for diagnosing personality disorders requires that thetraits and behaviors used to make the diagnosis be due not simply to theeffect of transient stressors or another psychiatric disorder such asdepression, mania, or anxiety disorders. Achilles' behaviors during wartimemay not reflect his typical behaviors at other times. Again, the hallmark ofpersonality and its disorders is the predictable, consistent, enduring patternof traits and behavior, not a series of behaviors during a time of crisis.Similarly, a fixation on honor and revenge and excessive mourning could hardlyqualify as obsessive-compulsive personality traits without further informationabout the culture, his relationship to the deceased, and so forth. \n \nDiagnosing personality disorders by literary text is seductivelyinteresting and creative but must be done with caution and a skeptical eye toavoid overgeneralizing from cross-sectional information.","PeriodicalId":22925,"journal":{"name":"The Western journal of medicine","volume":"134 1","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EWJM.176.3.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We humans seem to have an inherent urge to describe and label personalitiesin individuals we meet in everyday life, both professionally and personally.Unfortunately, neither lay descriptors nor psychiatric diagnoses easilycapture the sense we often have of others. In fact, describing andcategorizing personality and personality disorders have been among the weakestlinks in psychiatric nosology since the introduction of the Diagnostic andStatistical Manuals of Mental Disorders (DSMs). Even with the atheoretic,primarily descriptive approaches of DSM-III (published in 1980),DSM-III-R, andDSM-IV,1the section on personality disorders is the most problematic. Still, theinherent attraction of personality labeling is often too great to resist. In his essay, Walling uses the descriptions of Achilles' behaviors andpersonality traits in The Iliad to diagnose him according toDSM-IV criteria. Although the author selects passages from the textthat are consistent with his conclusion that Achilles had antisocialpersonality disorder, we should view this conclusion with great cautionbecause it illustrates some of the pitfalls of personality diagnoses. A personality disorder is an enduring and stable pattern of innerexperience and behavior that deviates markedly from cultural expectations, ispervasive and inflexible, begins in early adolescence or early adulthood, andleads to distress andimpairment.1 Becausepersonality disorders are longitudinal and stable, diagnoses based oncross-sectional examinations are fraught with difficulties. Thus, Achilles mayhave thought and acted as described in The Iliad and noted byWalling, but what do we know about his patterns of behavior throughout hislife? The DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder requiresymptoms of conduct disorder (similar to adult antisocial behaviors) beforeage 15. Was Achilles a destructive, aggressive, deceitful child or adolescent?Without this information, it is impossible to make an accurate diagnosis. In addition, diagnoses of personality disorders can be made only byexamining the individual's behavior in the context of his culture. AlthoughWalling describes some examples of Achilles' behavior that seem at variancewith his cultural norm, without a fuller knowledge of the culture, suchinterpretations are suspect. An explicit rule for diagnosing personality disorders requires that thetraits and behaviors used to make the diagnosis be due not simply to theeffect of transient stressors or another psychiatric disorder such asdepression, mania, or anxiety disorders. Achilles' behaviors during wartimemay not reflect his typical behaviors at other times. Again, the hallmark ofpersonality and its disorders is the predictable, consistent, enduring patternof traits and behavior, not a series of behaviors during a time of crisis.Similarly, a fixation on honor and revenge and excessive mourning could hardlyqualify as obsessive-compulsive personality traits without further informationabout the culture, his relationship to the deceased, and so forth. Diagnosing personality disorders by literary text is seductivelyinteresting and creative but must be done with caution and a skeptical eye toavoid overgeneralizing from cross-sectional information.
诊断人格障碍的不可抗拒的快乐和令人沮丧的陷阱。
我们人类似乎有一种内在的冲动,去描述和标记我们在日常生活中遇到的人的个性,无论是职业上的还是个人的。不幸的是,无论是外行的描述还是精神病学的诊断,都无法轻易捕捉到我们对他人的感觉。事实上,自从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(dsm)问世以来,人格和人格障碍的描述和分类一直是精神疾病分类学中最薄弱的环节之一。即使在DSM-III(出版于1980年)、DSM-III- r和dsm - iv的理论、主要描述方法中,关于人格障碍的部分也是最有问题的。然而,人格标签的内在吸引力往往太大,难以抗拒。在他的文章中,沃林利用《伊利亚特》中对阿喀琉斯的行为和人格特征的描述,根据dsm - iv的标准对他进行了诊断。尽管作者从文中选择的段落与他的结论阿基里斯患有反社会人格障碍相一致,但我们应该非常谨慎地看待这一结论,因为它说明了人格诊断的一些陷阱。人格障碍是一种持久和稳定的内在体验和行为模式,明显偏离文化期望,普遍和不灵活,始于青春期早期或成年早期,并导致痛苦和损害由于人格障碍是纵向和稳定的,基于横断面检查的诊断充满了困难。因此,阿喀琉斯的思想和行为可能与《伊利亚特》中所描述的和沃林所记录的一样,但我们对他一生的行为模式了解多少呢?反社会型人格障碍的DSM-IV标准要求在15岁之前有行为障碍的症状(类似于成人反社会行为)。阿喀琉斯是一个破坏性的、好斗的、欺骗的孩子或青少年吗?没有这些信息,就不可能做出准确的诊断。此外,人格障碍的诊断只能通过检查个人在其文化背景下的行为来做出。虽然沃林描述了一些阿喀琉斯的行为似乎与他的文化规范不同的例子,但如果没有对文化的更全面的了解,这样的解释是可疑的。诊断人格障碍的明确规则要求,用于诊断的特征和行为不能简单地归因于短暂的压力源或其他精神障碍(如抑郁症、躁狂或焦虑症)的影响。阿喀琉斯在战时的行为可能不能反映他在其他时候的典型行为。再说一次,人格及其障碍的标志是可预测的、一致的、持久的特征和行为模式,而不是危机时期的一系列行为。同样,如果没有对文化、与死者的关系等方面的进一步了解,对荣誉、复仇和过度哀悼的执着很难被定性为强迫性人格特征。通过文学文本诊断人格障碍既有趣又富有创造性,但必须谨慎行事,以怀疑的眼光来避免从横截面信息中过度概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信