Combination of Terrestrial and Satellite Topography for Pipeline Engineering and Construction

Philippe Guilbaud, Tanios Matta, Tamadher Al Bashr, Imtiaz Ali
{"title":"Combination of Terrestrial and Satellite Topography for Pipeline Engineering and Construction","authors":"Philippe Guilbaud, Tanios Matta, Tamadher Al Bashr, Imtiaz Ali","doi":"10.2118/207362-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A method consisting in an optimal combination of conventional topography from a terrestrial acquisition and satellite derived topography is presented. The solution recently implemented in the UAE for the engineering and the construction of a gas export pipeline allows significant cost reduction, time saving, and safety hazard reduction as fewer terrestrial operations are needed.\n The survey area is split into 2 sub-areas: area with infrastructures requiring a high accuracy is surveyed with terrestrial topographical acquisition methods such as GNSS receivers, the other one with desert conditions is mapped from satellite stereoscopic imagery. Stereoscopic mode refers to when the satellite sensor acquires two images of the same location taken from different angles. Using photogrammetric techniques, it produces a 3D elevation model of the area. The native satellite imagery allows a mapping of the surface features as well.\n Terrestrial and satellite datasets are finally merged and adjusted to provide engineering and construction contractors with a unique survey dataset.\n Terrestrial survey methods provide generally 5-10cm horizontal and vertical accuracies whereas satellite topography has accuracy of a few meters, so satellite topography must be controlled and adjusted from terrestrial ground control points which allow to reach an average 50cm absolute accuracy. This is good enough in desert areas with neither particular ground feature nor steep relief requiring complex design.\n Satellite acquisition has limitations: vegetation masking the ground, steep slopes and dense infrastructures. It is therefore necessary to combine conventional and satellite topography to meet engineering requirements. This is considered when defining the satellite and terrestrial survey areas.\n Beyond these limitations, this solution has strong advantages. Satellite grid resolution can be better (1-2m versus 5-10m for GNSS surveys). Acquisition and processing are faster (about 2 weeks versus a few weeks or months), and costs are from 10 to 100 times cheaper than conventional methods. No need for personnel and equipment on site, no management of logistics and permitting as well. Finally, it reduces safety hazards such as car accident, harsh weather, manual handling, etc.\n In addition, limiting the area to be surveyed with conventional equipment may avoid the need to mobilize Airborne photogrammetry or lidar systems usually operated by foreign companies. This limits complex Call for Tender, permitting management and give more opportunity to contract local companies.\n Satellite topography is widely used for preliminary studies, but the innovation here consists in an optimal combination of terrestrial and satellite datasets for engineering and construction purposes.\n This solution has however some limitations as it requires suitable conditions for satellite optical imagery acquisitions: no vegetation, limited cloud cover, smooth topography, and limited infrastructures. This is of interest basically in Middle east and North Africa.","PeriodicalId":11069,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207362-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A method consisting in an optimal combination of conventional topography from a terrestrial acquisition and satellite derived topography is presented. The solution recently implemented in the UAE for the engineering and the construction of a gas export pipeline allows significant cost reduction, time saving, and safety hazard reduction as fewer terrestrial operations are needed. The survey area is split into 2 sub-areas: area with infrastructures requiring a high accuracy is surveyed with terrestrial topographical acquisition methods such as GNSS receivers, the other one with desert conditions is mapped from satellite stereoscopic imagery. Stereoscopic mode refers to when the satellite sensor acquires two images of the same location taken from different angles. Using photogrammetric techniques, it produces a 3D elevation model of the area. The native satellite imagery allows a mapping of the surface features as well. Terrestrial and satellite datasets are finally merged and adjusted to provide engineering and construction contractors with a unique survey dataset. Terrestrial survey methods provide generally 5-10cm horizontal and vertical accuracies whereas satellite topography has accuracy of a few meters, so satellite topography must be controlled and adjusted from terrestrial ground control points which allow to reach an average 50cm absolute accuracy. This is good enough in desert areas with neither particular ground feature nor steep relief requiring complex design. Satellite acquisition has limitations: vegetation masking the ground, steep slopes and dense infrastructures. It is therefore necessary to combine conventional and satellite topography to meet engineering requirements. This is considered when defining the satellite and terrestrial survey areas. Beyond these limitations, this solution has strong advantages. Satellite grid resolution can be better (1-2m versus 5-10m for GNSS surveys). Acquisition and processing are faster (about 2 weeks versus a few weeks or months), and costs are from 10 to 100 times cheaper than conventional methods. No need for personnel and equipment on site, no management of logistics and permitting as well. Finally, it reduces safety hazards such as car accident, harsh weather, manual handling, etc. In addition, limiting the area to be surveyed with conventional equipment may avoid the need to mobilize Airborne photogrammetry or lidar systems usually operated by foreign companies. This limits complex Call for Tender, permitting management and give more opportunity to contract local companies. Satellite topography is widely used for preliminary studies, but the innovation here consists in an optimal combination of terrestrial and satellite datasets for engineering and construction purposes. This solution has however some limitations as it requires suitable conditions for satellite optical imagery acquisitions: no vegetation, limited cloud cover, smooth topography, and limited infrastructures. This is of interest basically in Middle east and North Africa.
地面与卫星地形相结合在管道工程建设中的应用
提出了一种将地面获取的常规地形与卫星获取的地形最优结合的方法。该解决方案最近在阿联酋实施,用于天然气出口管道的工程和建设,可以显著降低成本,节省时间,减少安全隐患,减少地面作业的需要。调查区域分为2个子区域:对基础设施精度要求较高的区域采用GNSS接收机等地面地形采集方法进行调查,对沙漠条件的区域采用卫星立体影像进行测绘。立体模式是指卫星传感器获取同一位置从不同角度拍摄的两幅图像。利用摄影测量技术,它产生了该地区的三维高程模型。本地卫星图像也允许对地表特征进行映射。地面和卫星数据集最终合并和调整,为工程和建筑承包商提供独特的测量数据集。地面测量方法通常提供5-10厘米的水平和垂直精度,而卫星地形的精度只有几米,因此必须从陆地地面控制点控制和调整卫星地形,这样才能达到平均50厘米的绝对精度。在沙漠地区,既没有特殊的地面特征,也没有需要复杂设计的陡峭地形,这已经足够好了。卫星采集有局限性:植被覆盖地面、陡坡和密集的基础设施。因此,有必要将常规地形与卫星地形相结合,以满足工程要求。在确定卫星和地面测量区域时考虑到这一点。除了这些限制之外,该解决方案还具有强大的优势。卫星网格分辨率可以更好(GNSS调查的分辨率为1-2m,而不是5-10m)。获取和处理速度更快(大约2周,而不是几周或几个月),成本比传统方法便宜10到100倍。不需要现场人员和设备,也不需要管理后勤和许可。最后,它减少了安全隐患,如车祸,恶劣天气,人工操作等。此外,限制使用传统设备进行测量的区域可能会避免需要调动通常由外国公司操作的机载摄影测量或激光雷达系统。这限制了复杂的招标,允许管理并提供更多机会与当地公司签订合同。卫星地形被广泛用于初步研究,但这里的创新在于将地面和卫星数据集最佳地组合在一起,用于工程和建设目的。然而,这种解决方案有一些局限性,因为它需要适合卫星光学图像获取的条件:没有植被,云层覆盖有限,地形平坦,基础设施有限。这在中东和北非很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信