Labor Market Flexibility: Advantages for Workforce or Threat?

A. A. Nugroho
{"title":"Labor Market Flexibility: Advantages for Workforce or Threat?","authors":"A. A. Nugroho","doi":"10.30589/pgr.v2i2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor Market Flexibility (LMF) which is supported by the law of supply and demand are considered capable of creating an efficient labor market. As well as apprenticeship programs were considered to improve the quality of the labor force which can suppress the number of unemployed. Whether the application of LMF can be a positive impact like as imagined by its proponents? This is the result of research that seeks to see the dynamics of industrial relations faced by the workforce under the LMF system and dismantle the neoliberal project of the apprenticeship system. The study was conducted during September-November 2016 in the industrial area of Bekasi. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach. Collecting data through participatory research or live in. Searchable data sources using methods of a snowball effect. In the end, this study involved seven trade unions, six companies, two foundations labor brokers, three government agencies, 35 workers (10 contract workers, 10 workers outsourcing, and 15 workers apprenticeship) and three labor activists. The result is the implementation of contract system and outsourcing many violate the rules. In the industrial area of Bekasi composition flexible workforce of more than 50% of the total workforce. And under the LMF system occurs bureaucratization in industrial relations. In addition, LMF policy does not reduce unemployment but only rotate unemployment. and the apprenticeship system is expected to increase human resources in the labor force application only used by the owners of capital to get cheap labor.","PeriodicalId":32198,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Governance Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Governance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v2i2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Labor Market Flexibility (LMF) which is supported by the law of supply and demand are considered capable of creating an efficient labor market. As well as apprenticeship programs were considered to improve the quality of the labor force which can suppress the number of unemployed. Whether the application of LMF can be a positive impact like as imagined by its proponents? This is the result of research that seeks to see the dynamics of industrial relations faced by the workforce under the LMF system and dismantle the neoliberal project of the apprenticeship system. The study was conducted during September-November 2016 in the industrial area of Bekasi. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach. Collecting data through participatory research or live in. Searchable data sources using methods of a snowball effect. In the end, this study involved seven trade unions, six companies, two foundations labor brokers, three government agencies, 35 workers (10 contract workers, 10 workers outsourcing, and 15 workers apprenticeship) and three labor activists. The result is the implementation of contract system and outsourcing many violate the rules. In the industrial area of Bekasi composition flexible workforce of more than 50% of the total workforce. And under the LMF system occurs bureaucratization in industrial relations. In addition, LMF policy does not reduce unemployment but only rotate unemployment. and the apprenticeship system is expected to increase human resources in the labor force application only used by the owners of capital to get cheap labor.
劳动力市场灵活性:对劳动力有利还是威胁?
劳动力市场灵活性(LMF)是由供给和需求规律支持的,被认为能够创造一个有效的劳动力市场。此外,学徒计划被认为可以提高劳动力的质量,从而抑制失业人数。LMF的应用是否能像支持者想象的那样产生积极的影响?这是一项研究的结果,该研究旨在了解LMF制度下劳动力面临的工业关系动态,并拆除学徒制度的新自由主义项目。该研究于2016年9月至11月在Bekasi工业区进行。该研究采用了描述性定性方法。通过参与式研究或生活收集数据。使用滚雪球效应方法的可搜索数据源。最终,本研究涉及7个工会、6个公司、2个基金会劳工中介、3个政府机构、35名工人(10名合同工、10名外包工人、15名学徒工人)和3名劳工活动家。其结果是承包制和外包的实施屡屡违规。在贝卡西工业区,灵活劳动力构成占总劳动力的50%以上。在LMF制度下,劳资关系出现了官僚化。此外,LMF政策并没有减少失业,而只是使失业轮转。而学徒制则有望增加人力资源中劳动力的运用,只有资本所有者才能利用其获得廉价劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信