EFEK PENGGUNAAN DOUBLE DAN SINGLE PISTON CALIPER TERHADAP WAKTU DAN JARAK TEMPUH PADA PENGEREMAN SEPEDA MOTOR 125 CC

Jurnal Konversi, Energi dan Manufaktur, Darwin Rio, Budi Syaka, Muhammad Rafi Iqbal, Kata Kunci, Jarak Tempuh, Rem Kaliper, Waktu Pengereman
{"title":"EFEK PENGGUNAAN DOUBLE DAN SINGLE PISTON CALIPER TERHADAP WAKTU DAN JARAK TEMPUH PADA PENGEREMAN SEPEDA MOTOR 125 CC","authors":"Jurnal Konversi, Energi dan Manufaktur, Darwin Rio, Budi Syaka, Muhammad Rafi Iqbal, Kata Kunci, Jarak Tempuh, Rem Kaliper, Waktu Pengereman","doi":"10.21009/jkem.8.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the distance and braking time on 125cc motorcycle vehicles by using two types of callipers, namely single-piston and double-piston callipers. The research method uses experimental methods.  There this method will compare 2 variables to get the results of the study by sulking on SNI Braking. By varying the two callipers of different types and using the brake pressure gauge, stopwatch, and meter to find out the pressure, time, and distance when conducting the test, the results of the test are calculated by the formula of regularly changing straight motion force (GLBB) slowed down, braking force and braking efficiency formula in order to get more valid results. Based on the results of this research report, it was concluded that the 2-piston callipers are superior to the 1-piston callipers in terms of average mileage of 0.51 m (9.81 m – 9.30 m) in front wheel braking and average mileage of 0.42 m (4.63 m – 4.21 m) in rear wheel braking and average stopping time of 0.21 s (2.51 s – 2.30 s) with the average effect of braking efficiency value of 5% (57% - 52 %) on front wheel braking and the average time for 0.21 s (1.58 s – 1.37 s) with the average effect of efficiency value of 5 % (47 % - 42 %) on rear wheel braking. So that makes 2-piston callipers better used in 125 cc vehicles than 1-piston callipers in terms of braking aspects.","PeriodicalId":53345,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Energi Dan Manufaktur","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Energi Dan Manufaktur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jkem.8.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the distance and braking time on 125cc motorcycle vehicles by using two types of callipers, namely single-piston and double-piston callipers. The research method uses experimental methods.  There this method will compare 2 variables to get the results of the study by sulking on SNI Braking. By varying the two callipers of different types and using the brake pressure gauge, stopwatch, and meter to find out the pressure, time, and distance when conducting the test, the results of the test are calculated by the formula of regularly changing straight motion force (GLBB) slowed down, braking force and braking efficiency formula in order to get more valid results. Based on the results of this research report, it was concluded that the 2-piston callipers are superior to the 1-piston callipers in terms of average mileage of 0.51 m (9.81 m – 9.30 m) in front wheel braking and average mileage of 0.42 m (4.63 m – 4.21 m) in rear wheel braking and average stopping time of 0.21 s (2.51 s – 2.30 s) with the average effect of braking efficiency value of 5% (57% - 52 %) on front wheel braking and the average time for 0.21 s (1.58 s – 1.37 s) with the average effect of efficiency value of 5 % (47 % - 42 %) on rear wheel braking. So that makes 2-piston callipers better used in 125 cc vehicles than 1-piston callipers in terms of braking aspects.
双冲程活塞和单冲程活塞对发动机制动时间和距离的影响
本研究使用单活塞卡钳和双活塞卡钳两种卡钳来确定125cc摩托车的制动距离和制动时间。研究方法采用实验方法。该方法将对两个变量进行比较,通过对SNI制动进行仿真得到研究结果。通过更换两种不同型号的卡尺,在进行试验时使用制动压力表、秒表、计量表等来获取压力、时间、距离等信息,通过恒变直线运动力(GLBB)减速、制动力和制动力效率公式来计算试验结果,从而得到更有效的结果。根据这份研究报告的结果,得出2-piston卡尺是优于1-piston卡钳的平均里程0.51米(9.81米- 9.30米)在前轮制动和平均里程0.42米(4.63米- 4.21米)在后轮制动和平均停留时间0.21秒(2.51 - 2.30年代)与制动效率的平均效应值为5%(57% - 52%)前轮制动和平均时间为0.21秒(1.58 - 1.37年代)效率的平均效应值为5% (47% - 42%)后轮制动。因此,在制动方面,双活塞卡钳比单活塞卡钳更适用于125cc的车辆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信