Bias, its minimization or circumvention to simplify internal quality assurance

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
R. Haeckel, E. Gurr, T. Hoff, on behalf of the working group Guide Limits of the
{"title":"Bias, its minimization or circumvention to simplify internal quality assurance","authors":"R. Haeckel, E. Gurr, T. Hoff, on behalf of the working group Guide Limits of the","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2016-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Several concepts of analytical bias and remedies to minimize bias have been suggested with the ultimate goal to disregard it. Short-term bias (within one control cycle) should be treated as a random error if it is less than the permissible limits. Long-term bias should be eliminated if it is known or circumvented by estimating intra-laboratory reference limits (RLs). Consequently, analytical uncertainty could be reduced to permissible imprecision. Then, models combining imprecision and bias would become irrelevant, and the numerical value of total analytical error would become identical with imprecision. The purpose of the present report is to simplify quality assurance schemes considerably by disregarding bias either by estimating RLs or by verifying the applied reference limits (checking the transferability) as requested by ISO and CLSI.","PeriodicalId":49926,"journal":{"name":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"518 1","pages":"263 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2016-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Several concepts of analytical bias and remedies to minimize bias have been suggested with the ultimate goal to disregard it. Short-term bias (within one control cycle) should be treated as a random error if it is less than the permissible limits. Long-term bias should be eliminated if it is known or circumvented by estimating intra-laboratory reference limits (RLs). Consequently, analytical uncertainty could be reduced to permissible imprecision. Then, models combining imprecision and bias would become irrelevant, and the numerical value of total analytical error would become identical with imprecision. The purpose of the present report is to simplify quality assurance schemes considerably by disregarding bias either by estimating RLs or by verifying the applied reference limits (checking the transferability) as requested by ISO and CLSI.
偏差,其最小化或规避,以简化内部质量保证
摘要:分析偏差的几个概念和补救措施,以减少偏差的最终目标是忽略它已经提出。如果短期偏差(在一个控制周期内)小于允许范围,则应视为随机误差。如果已知或通过估计实验室内参考限值(RLs)规避了长期偏倚,则应消除长期偏倚。因此,分析不确定度可以减少到允许的不精确。然后,结合不精度和偏差的模型将变得无关紧要,总分析误差的数值将与不精度相同。本报告的目的是根据ISO和CLSI的要求,通过估计RLs或通过核查适用的参考限度(检查可转移性)来消除偏见,从而大大简化质量保证计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信