Adaptation, Litigation, and Petrifaction: Bernard Shaw and That "loathsome plagiarism" The Chocolate Soldier

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
C. Wixson
{"title":"Adaptation, Litigation, and Petrifaction: Bernard Shaw and That \"loathsome plagiarism\" The Chocolate Soldier","authors":"C. Wixson","doi":"10.5325/shaw.43.1.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Between July 1925 and March 1928, Bernard Shaw clashed with an attorney called Jesse Levinson over whether any cinematic version of The Chocolate Soldier would infringe his copyright on Arms and the Man. The case charted novel contours of intellectual property rights with regard to \"talking picture\" adaptation. Shaw would, in the course of preparing for this particular trial, discover that stunning acts of plagiarism had already occurred in the musical adaptation of Arms and the Man, entailing consequences for its prospective transfer to film. Although it caught the attention of the press at the time, the protracted legal dispute receives scarce mention in the scholarly conversation around Shaw's life and writing. A much fuller account of it, however, emerges from the archived casefile of Shaw's London solicitors, newly acquired by David Grapes.","PeriodicalId":40781,"journal":{"name":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":"34 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/shaw.43.1.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Between July 1925 and March 1928, Bernard Shaw clashed with an attorney called Jesse Levinson over whether any cinematic version of The Chocolate Soldier would infringe his copyright on Arms and the Man. The case charted novel contours of intellectual property rights with regard to "talking picture" adaptation. Shaw would, in the course of preparing for this particular trial, discover that stunning acts of plagiarism had already occurred in the musical adaptation of Arms and the Man, entailing consequences for its prospective transfer to film. Although it caught the attention of the press at the time, the protracted legal dispute receives scarce mention in the scholarly conversation around Shaw's life and writing. A much fuller account of it, however, emerges from the archived casefile of Shaw's London solicitors, newly acquired by David Grapes.
改编、诉讼和石化:萧伯纳和“令人厌恶的抄袭”《巧克力兵》
1925年7月至1928年3月间,萧伯纳与一位名叫杰西·莱文森的律师就《巧克力兵》的电影版本是否会侵犯他的《武器与人》版权发生了冲突。这个案例为“会说话的图片”的改编绘制了新的知识产权轮廓。在准备这次特别审判的过程中,萧伯纳发现音乐剧《武器与男人》中已经出现了令人震惊的抄袭行为,这为改编成电影带来了后果。尽管当时引起了媒体的注意,但在围绕邵逸夫生活和写作的学术讨论中,这场旷日持久的法律纠纷却很少被提及。然而,一个更全面的描述出现在大卫葡萄新获得的肖氏伦敦律师的档案中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信