Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version Brief

Q1 Social Sciences
B. Keum, Christina J. Thai, N. Truong, Harim Lydia Ahn, Yun Lu
{"title":"Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version Brief","authors":"B. Keum, Christina J. Thai, N. Truong, Harim Lydia Ahn, Yun Lu","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2018.1436578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version Brief (PEDQ-CVB) is a widely used brief multidimensional measure of general racial discrimination for both students and community populations. We evaluated the factor structure and measurement equivalency of the PEDQ-CVB across diverse racial/ethnic and gender groups. The groups in the current study were Black (N = 306), Asian (N = 310), Latinx (N = 163), multiracial (N = 108), women (N = 555), and men (N = 372). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and test of competing models suggested that the four-factor and bifactor (with four specific factors and one general factor) models were best fitting and most conceptually meaningful. Based on the bifactor model, the PEDQ-CVB could be represented unidimensionally (total scale score) for applied measurement. Multi-group CFAs found evidence of measurement invariance for configural, metric, and scalar models across racial/ethnic and gender groups, suggesting that men and women, and individuals self-identifying as Black, Asian, Latinx and multiracial, interpreted PEDQ-CVB items in a similar fashion. Our findings substantiate the utility of the PEDQ-CVB as a brief general measure of racial/ethnic discrimination and the validity of results from prior studies that used the PEDQ-CVB. Study limitations and future directions for research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"498 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1436578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version Brief (PEDQ-CVB) is a widely used brief multidimensional measure of general racial discrimination for both students and community populations. We evaluated the factor structure and measurement equivalency of the PEDQ-CVB across diverse racial/ethnic and gender groups. The groups in the current study were Black (N = 306), Asian (N = 310), Latinx (N = 163), multiracial (N = 108), women (N = 555), and men (N = 372). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and test of competing models suggested that the four-factor and bifactor (with four specific factors and one general factor) models were best fitting and most conceptually meaningful. Based on the bifactor model, the PEDQ-CVB could be represented unidimensionally (total scale score) for applied measurement. Multi-group CFAs found evidence of measurement invariance for configural, metric, and scalar models across racial/ethnic and gender groups, suggesting that men and women, and individuals self-identifying as Black, Asian, Latinx and multiracial, interpreted PEDQ-CVB items in a similar fashion. Our findings substantiate the utility of the PEDQ-CVB as a brief general measure of racial/ethnic discrimination and the validity of results from prior studies that used the PEDQ-CVB. Study limitations and future directions for research are discussed.
民族歧视知觉问卷的因素结构与测量不变性-社区版摘要
种族歧视感知问卷-社区版本概要(PEDQ-CVB)是一种广泛使用的针对学生和社区人群的一般性种族歧视的简短多维测量方法。我们评估了不同种族/民族和性别群体PEDQ-CVB的因素结构和测量等效性。目前研究的人群包括黑人(306)、亚洲人(310)、拉丁裔(163)、多种族(108)、女性(555)和男性(372)。验证性因子分析(CFA)和竞争模型的检验表明,四因素和双因素(四个特定因素和一个一般因素)模型最适合和最具概念意义。基于双因子模型,PEDQ-CVB可以单维表示(总量表得分)用于应用测量。多群体CFAs发现了跨种族/民族和性别群体的配置、度量和标量模型的测量不变性的证据,这表明男性和女性,以及自我认同为黑人、亚洲人、拉丁裔和多种族的个体,以相似的方式解释PEDQ-CVB项目。我们的研究结果证实了PEDQ-CVB作为种族/民族歧视的简单通用测量的效用,以及先前使用PEDQ-CVB的研究结果的有效性。讨论了研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信