Social capital strengthens agency among fish farmers: Small scale aquaculture in Bulacan, Philippines

Aisa O. Manlosa, J. Albrecht, Maraja Riechers
{"title":"Social capital strengthens agency among fish farmers: Small scale aquaculture in Bulacan, Philippines","authors":"Aisa O. Manlosa, J. Albrecht, Maraja Riechers","doi":"10.3389/faquc.2023.1106416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a case study approach focusing on Bulacan, Philippines, we examined three types of social capital (i.e. bonding, bridging, and linking) accessed by small scale aquaculture producers through fish farmers associations. The aim was to determine whether and how types of social capital contribute to promoting human agency among small scale aquaculture producers in the context of their livelihoods. Here, agency is considered an important part of sustainable livelihoods and is defined as people’s ability to choose in ways that align with their values and goals, and to act to realise their goals. Agency was analysed in relation to livelihood preconditions, processes, power, and possibilities. The premise of this paper is that types of social capital from fish farmers’ associations distinctly contribute to expanding and strengthening the agency of small scale aquaculture producers. The study found that all three types of social capital contributed to enhancing the resources that producers draw on for their livelihoods. The bonding and bridging types helped producers cope with various livelihood challenges by enabling access to mutual assistance and collective efforts for problem solving. The types of social capital were less effective in addressing issues of asymmetrical power relations which adversely affected livelihoods. All three types and particularly linking social capital contributed to expanding livelihood possibilities and enabling producers to explore new avenues for improving livelihoods, enhancing agency. The findings point to the distinct contributions and complementarity of different types of social capital to the exercise of agency in livelihoods. Attending to the different types of social capital and understanding how they are most beneficial in specific contexts as well as where they are insufficent, can improve priority-setting, targeting, and design for initiatives that seek to work with fish farmers organisations and other types of community-based organisations for livelihood improvements.","PeriodicalId":101308,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aquaculture","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/faquc.2023.1106416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a case study approach focusing on Bulacan, Philippines, we examined three types of social capital (i.e. bonding, bridging, and linking) accessed by small scale aquaculture producers through fish farmers associations. The aim was to determine whether and how types of social capital contribute to promoting human agency among small scale aquaculture producers in the context of their livelihoods. Here, agency is considered an important part of sustainable livelihoods and is defined as people’s ability to choose in ways that align with their values and goals, and to act to realise their goals. Agency was analysed in relation to livelihood preconditions, processes, power, and possibilities. The premise of this paper is that types of social capital from fish farmers’ associations distinctly contribute to expanding and strengthening the agency of small scale aquaculture producers. The study found that all three types of social capital contributed to enhancing the resources that producers draw on for their livelihoods. The bonding and bridging types helped producers cope with various livelihood challenges by enabling access to mutual assistance and collective efforts for problem solving. The types of social capital were less effective in addressing issues of asymmetrical power relations which adversely affected livelihoods. All three types and particularly linking social capital contributed to expanding livelihood possibilities and enabling producers to explore new avenues for improving livelihoods, enhancing agency. The findings point to the distinct contributions and complementarity of different types of social capital to the exercise of agency in livelihoods. Attending to the different types of social capital and understanding how they are most beneficial in specific contexts as well as where they are insufficent, can improve priority-setting, targeting, and design for initiatives that seek to work with fish farmers organisations and other types of community-based organisations for livelihood improvements.
社会资本加强了鱼农之间的代理:菲律宾布拉干的小规模水产养殖
采用以菲律宾布拉干为重点的案例研究方法,我们考察了小规模水产养殖生产者通过养鱼户协会获得的三种类型的社会资本(即纽带、桥接和连接)。其目的是确定社会资本类型是否以及如何有助于促进小规模水产养殖生产者在其生计方面的人的能动性。在这里,能动性被认为是可持续生计的重要组成部分,并被定义为人们选择符合其价值观和目标的方式并采取行动实现其目标的能力。分析了机构与生计先决条件、过程、权力和可能性的关系。本文的前提是,来自鱼农协会的社会资本类型明显有助于扩大和加强小规模水产养殖生产者的代理。研究发现,这三种类型的社会资本都有助于增加生产者赖以生存的资源。联系和桥梁类型帮助生产者应对各种生计挑战,使他们能够获得互助和集体努力来解决问题。社会资本类型在解决对生计产生不利影响的不对称权力关系问题方面效果较差。所有这三种类型,特别是将社会资本联系起来,有助于扩大生计的可能性,使生产者能够探索改善生计的新途径,增强能动性。研究结果指出,不同类型的社会资本对生计代理的行使有不同的贡献和互补性。关注不同类型的社会资本,了解它们如何在特定情况下最有益,以及它们在哪些方面不足,可以改善优先事项的设定、目标和设计,以寻求与养鱼户组织和其他类型的社区组织合作,改善生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信