PATIENT AND OBSERVER SCAR ASSESSMENT FOLLOWING BASAL CELL CARCINOMA SURGERY: MULTICENTER QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.6820
Moizza Tahir, Ghazanfar Ali, Najia Ahmad, J. M. Khan, S. Sadiq, M. Tahir
{"title":"PATIENT AND OBSERVER SCAR ASSESSMENT FOLLOWING BASAL CELL CARCINOMA SURGERY: MULTICENTER QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY","authors":"Moizza Tahir, Ghazanfar Ali, Najia Ahmad, J. M. Khan, S. Sadiq, M. Tahir","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.6820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess patient and observer reported scar quality after Basal cell carcinoma surgery of face using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). \nStudy Design: Quasi experimental study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Dermatology Department, Tertiary Care Hospitals at Multan and Karachi and Plastic Surgery Department, Tertiary Care Hospital Multan, from Apr to Sep 2020. \nMethodology: Patients with basal cell carcinoma that full filled inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled by consecutive sampling technique at Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Department after informed consent. Surgical excision was followed by reconstruction of defect either by direct closure or by rotation or advancement flap. Surgical scar was assessed independently at 8 weeks by POSAS. Data was analyzed with SPSS-23. \nResults: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in study. There were 11 (37.9%) males and 16 (59.25%) females between ages of 45-70 years. Basal cell carcinoma was located on cheek in 15 (55.5%), nose in 9 (33.3%), temple 2 (7.4%) and forehead 1 (3.7%) cases. Direct closure was performed in 6 (22.2%), rotation flaps in 10 (40.7%), and advancement flaps in 11 (40.7%) cases. Mean score of observer opinion about surgical scar between different surgical techniques was not statistically significant (p=0.191). How-ever, mean score of patient opinion of scar between different surgical techniques was statistically significant (p=0.032). \nConclusion: POSAS is a valid tool for scar evaluation by patient and observer-reported scar qualities after Basal cell carcinoma surgery.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.6820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess patient and observer reported scar quality after Basal cell carcinoma surgery of face using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Dermatology Department, Tertiary Care Hospitals at Multan and Karachi and Plastic Surgery Department, Tertiary Care Hospital Multan, from Apr to Sep 2020. Methodology: Patients with basal cell carcinoma that full filled inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled by consecutive sampling technique at Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Department after informed consent. Surgical excision was followed by reconstruction of defect either by direct closure or by rotation or advancement flap. Surgical scar was assessed independently at 8 weeks by POSAS. Data was analyzed with SPSS-23. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in study. There were 11 (37.9%) males and 16 (59.25%) females between ages of 45-70 years. Basal cell carcinoma was located on cheek in 15 (55.5%), nose in 9 (33.3%), temple 2 (7.4%) and forehead 1 (3.7%) cases. Direct closure was performed in 6 (22.2%), rotation flaps in 10 (40.7%), and advancement flaps in 11 (40.7%) cases. Mean score of observer opinion about surgical scar between different surgical techniques was not statistically significant (p=0.191). How-ever, mean score of patient opinion of scar between different surgical techniques was statistically significant (p=0.032). Conclusion: POSAS is a valid tool for scar evaluation by patient and observer-reported scar qualities after Basal cell carcinoma surgery.
基底细胞癌手术后患者和观察者疤痕评估:多中心准实验研究
目的:应用患者与观察者疤痕评定量表(POSAS)评价面部基底细胞癌术后患者和观察者报告的疤痕质量。研究设计:准实验研究。学习地点和时间:木尔坦和卡拉奇三级医院皮肤科和木尔坦三级医院整形外科,时间为2020年4月至9月。方法:在知情同意后,采用连续抽样技术纳入皮肤整形外科完全符合纳入和排除标准的基底细胞癌患者。手术切除后重建缺损直接关闭或旋转或推进皮瓣。8周时采用POSAS对手术瘢痕进行独立评估。数据采用SPSS-23进行分析。结果:共有27例患者入组。45 ~ 70岁男性11例(37.9%),女性16例(59.25%)。基底细胞癌位于脸颊15例(55.5%),鼻子9例(33.3%),太阳穴2例(7.4%),前额1例(3.7%)。直接闭合6例(22.2%),旋转皮瓣10例(40.7%),推进皮瓣11例(40.7%)。不同手术方式对手术瘢痕的观察评分平均值比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.191)。不同手术方式患者对瘢痕的意见平均得分差异有统计学意义(p=0.032)。结论:POSAS是评估基底细胞癌术后患者和观察者报告的疤痕质量的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信