Tuning the office sound masking and the architectonics of office work

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Joeri Bruyninckx
{"title":"Tuning the office sound masking and the architectonics of office work","authors":"Joeri Bruyninckx","doi":"10.1080/20551940.2022.2162765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the emergence and development of a new soundscape of work in the open-plan office. To understand the persistent tension between public social interaction and private undisturbed work in many open-offices today, I argue that we need to account for the perceptual engineering that has been built into its very concept. To do so, I reconstruct the development and reception of Action Office 2, a pioneering and influential open-plan office concept that was launched by manufacturer Herman Miller Inc. in the late 1960s. I show how its designers sought to optimise the office as an informatic system by balancing workers’ experience of exposure and enclosure in the open-plan office. This informatic challenge coincided with a new approach to office acoustics in the 1960s and 1970s that focused on managing intelligibility and improving privacy rather than noise. Examining this “perceptual technic” reveals how noise became an architectonic element that served to optimise and economise a relation between private and public experience of work. Ultimately, I argue, this technic and the sound masking technologies that derive from it have helped sustain both the open-plan office to the present day, but also the tensions underlying it.","PeriodicalId":53207,"journal":{"name":"Sound Studies","volume":"84 1 1","pages":"64 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2022.2162765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the emergence and development of a new soundscape of work in the open-plan office. To understand the persistent tension between public social interaction and private undisturbed work in many open-offices today, I argue that we need to account for the perceptual engineering that has been built into its very concept. To do so, I reconstruct the development and reception of Action Office 2, a pioneering and influential open-plan office concept that was launched by manufacturer Herman Miller Inc. in the late 1960s. I show how its designers sought to optimise the office as an informatic system by balancing workers’ experience of exposure and enclosure in the open-plan office. This informatic challenge coincided with a new approach to office acoustics in the 1960s and 1970s that focused on managing intelligibility and improving privacy rather than noise. Examining this “perceptual technic” reveals how noise became an architectonic element that served to optimise and economise a relation between private and public experience of work. Ultimately, I argue, this technic and the sound masking technologies that derive from it have helped sustain both the open-plan office to the present day, but also the tensions underlying it.
调整办公室的声音掩蔽和办公室工作的架构
摘要:本文探讨了开放式办公室中一种新的工作声景的出现和发展。为了理解当今许多开放式办公室中公共社会互动与私人不受干扰的工作之间持续存在的紧张关系,我认为我们需要考虑到其概念本身所包含的感知工程。为了做到这一点,我重构了行动办公室2的发展和接受,这是一个开创性的和有影响力的开放式办公室概念,是由制造商赫尔曼米勒公司在20世纪60年代末推出的。我展示了它的设计师如何通过平衡员工在开放式办公室的暴露和封闭的体验来优化办公室作为一个信息系统。这种信息挑战与20世纪60年代和70年代办公室声学的新方法相吻合,该方法侧重于管理可理解性和改善隐私,而不是噪音。研究这种“感知技术”揭示了噪音如何成为一种建筑元素,用于优化和节约私人和公共工作体验之间的关系。最终,我认为,这项技术和由此产生的声音掩蔽技术不仅帮助维持了开放式办公室的现状,而且也维持了其背后的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sound Studies
Sound Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信