Pubblicità, educazione e diritto in Kant

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-671-1

Romina Perni

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The starting point is the conviction that publicity is central to Kantian political thought as part of the wider relationship between politics and morality. In this sense the book aims to outline subjective and objective limits of the public control of power, which must be structurally guaranteed from a juridical point of view and that citizens/subjects have to put into practice. But from a Kantian point of view publicity is also linked to education and to the public use of reason, that individuals must have the courage to realize. The individual dimension and the collective/institutional one are tightly linked to answer the question: according to Kant, is it possible an education to publicity?

查看原文本刊更多论文

康德的广告、教育和法律

本书的出发点是相信，作为政治与道德之间更广泛关系的一部分，公共性是康德政治思想的核心。从这个意义上讲，本书旨在概述公共权力控制的主观和客观限制，这些限制必须从法律的角度得到结构上的保证，并且公民/主体必须付诸实践。但从康德的观点来看，公共性也与教育和理性的公共运用联系在一起，个人必须有勇气去实现这一点。个人维度和集体/制度维度紧密联系在一起，以回答这个问题:根据康德的观点，是否可能有一种公共性的教育?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.