A randomized controlled trial of brief intervention for patients with cannabis use disorder.

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Dendrochronologia Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-24 DOI:10.25259/JNRP_79_2023
Anil Singh Shekhawat, Rahul Mathur, Siddharth Sarkar, Gauri Shanker Kaloiya, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of brief intervention for patients with cannabis use disorder.","authors":"Anil Singh Shekhawat, Rahul Mathur, Siddharth Sarkar, Gauri Shanker Kaloiya, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara","doi":"10.25259/JNRP_79_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Effective interventions for cannabis use disorders are fairly limited. The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the reduction in cannabis use (number of days cannabis used) with brief intervention and simple advice in patients with cannabis use disorder.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This non-blinded and parallel two-group RCT included 100 male patients with cannabis use disorder. A semi-structured pro forma and severity of dependence scale (SDS) were used. Participants were then randomized to either of the two arms (brief intervention and simple advice) in a 1:1 ratio. Cannabis use patterns and SDS scores were assessed over the phone at week 4, week 8, and week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable in sociodemographics and cannabis use characteristics. Participants in both groups were using cannabis for 30 days in the past month before enrolment. The brief intervention group had a lesser number of days of cannabis use vis-a-vis the simple advice group at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. There was a significant time effect for change in SDS scores (F = 30.629, <i>P</i> < 0.001), but the group effect was not significant (F = 0.379, <i>P</i> = 0.541).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this population of regular cannabis users, brief intervention may be useful in reducing cannabis usage. It can be integrated into routine assessments and management of those with regular use of cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50595,"journal":{"name":"Dendrochronologia","volume":"31 1","pages":"710-716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dendrochronologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_79_2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Effective interventions for cannabis use disorders are fairly limited. The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the reduction in cannabis use (number of days cannabis used) with brief intervention and simple advice in patients with cannabis use disorder.

Materials and methods: This non-blinded and parallel two-group RCT included 100 male patients with cannabis use disorder. A semi-structured pro forma and severity of dependence scale (SDS) were used. Participants were then randomized to either of the two arms (brief intervention and simple advice) in a 1:1 ratio. Cannabis use patterns and SDS scores were assessed over the phone at week 4, week 8, and week 12.

Results: The two groups were comparable in sociodemographics and cannabis use characteristics. Participants in both groups were using cannabis for 30 days in the past month before enrolment. The brief intervention group had a lesser number of days of cannabis use vis-a-vis the simple advice group at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. There was a significant time effect for change in SDS scores (F = 30.629, P < 0.001), but the group effect was not significant (F = 0.379, P = 0.541).

Conclusion: In this population of regular cannabis users, brief intervention may be useful in reducing cannabis usage. It can be integrated into routine assessments and management of those with regular use of cannabis.

大麻使用障碍患者短暂干预的随机对照试验。
目的:对大麻使用障碍的有效干预相当有限。目前的随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较大麻使用障碍患者的简短干预和简单建议减少大麻使用(大麻使用天数)。材料和方法:该非盲平行两组随机对照试验纳入100例男性大麻使用障碍患者。采用半结构化形式量表和依赖严重程度量表(SDS)。然后,参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到两组(简短干预和简单建议)中的任何一组。在第4周、第8周和第12周通过电话评估大麻使用模式和SDS评分。结果:两组在社会人口统计学和大麻使用特征方面具有可比性。两组参与者在入组前一个月内都使用了30天大麻。与简单建议组相比,简短干预组在4周、8周和12周的大麻使用天数较少。SDS评分变化存在显著的时间效应(F = 30.629, P < 0.001),但组效应不显著(F = 0.379, P = 0.541)。结论:在这个经常使用大麻的人群中,简短的干预可能有助于减少大麻的使用。它可以纳入对经常使用大麻的人的例行评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dendrochronologia
Dendrochronologia FORESTRY-GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
22.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dendrochronologia is a peer-reviewed international scholarly journal that presents high-quality research related to growth rings of woody plants, i.e., trees and shrubs, and the application of tree-ring studies. The areas covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: Archaeology Botany Climatology Ecology Forestry Geology Hydrology Original research articles, reviews, communications, technical notes and personal notes are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信