{"title":"Cover and barrier effect of Cassia siamea hedgerows on soil conservation in semi-arid Kenya","authors":"Paul Kiepe","doi":"10.1016/S0933-3630(96)00010-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The contribution of <em>Cassia siamea</em> hedgerows and mulch to erosion control was evaluated on a 14% slope of a Lixisol/Alfisol at Machakos, Kenya. The four treatments, in 400 m<sup>2</sup> runoff-plots were: hedgerows with prunings applied as mulch to the crop, hedgerows and crops with prunings removed, mulch only applied to the crop and a control. The hedgerows were planted on the contour, 4 m apart and 0.25 m between plants. Maize and cowpea were planted in sequence. The control plot sustained an average annual water loss over 3 y of 31 mm runoff and soil loss of 19 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The best treatment, hedgerows with mulch, reduced losses to 13% and 2% of the control. Hedgerows without mulch reduced losses respectively to 23% and 7%, while mulch without hedgerows reduced losses to 41% and 17%. Soil loss was considerably influenced by one single storm in April 1990 due to the nature of that storm and to the susceptibility of the soil to erosion at that particular time. Differences in crop yield between treatments were small. The hedgerow treatments depressed cowpea yield slightly in less than normal rainy seasons but improved cowpea yields in wet seasons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101170,"journal":{"name":"Soil Technology","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0933-3630(96)00010-4","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933363096000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Abstract
The contribution of Cassia siamea hedgerows and mulch to erosion control was evaluated on a 14% slope of a Lixisol/Alfisol at Machakos, Kenya. The four treatments, in 400 m2 runoff-plots were: hedgerows with prunings applied as mulch to the crop, hedgerows and crops with prunings removed, mulch only applied to the crop and a control. The hedgerows were planted on the contour, 4 m apart and 0.25 m between plants. Maize and cowpea were planted in sequence. The control plot sustained an average annual water loss over 3 y of 31 mm runoff and soil loss of 19 t ha−1. The best treatment, hedgerows with mulch, reduced losses to 13% and 2% of the control. Hedgerows without mulch reduced losses respectively to 23% and 7%, while mulch without hedgerows reduced losses to 41% and 17%. Soil loss was considerably influenced by one single storm in April 1990 due to the nature of that storm and to the susceptibility of the soil to erosion at that particular time. Differences in crop yield between treatments were small. The hedgerow treatments depressed cowpea yield slightly in less than normal rainy seasons but improved cowpea yields in wet seasons.
在肯尼亚Machakos的Lixisol/Alfisol的14%斜坡上,评估了决明子树篱和地膜对侵蚀控制的贡献。在400平方米的径流地块上,四种处理分别是:将修剪的树篱作为覆盖物覆盖在作物上,将修剪的树篱和作物去除,仅对作物进行覆盖物覆盖和对照。树篱种植在等高线上,植物间间隔4 m, 0.25 m。玉米和豇豆是按顺序种植的。对照区年径流量为31 mm,年平均失水超过3年,土壤流失量为19 t ha - 1。最好的处理方法是用覆盖物覆盖树篱,将损失减少到对照的13%和2%。没有覆盖的绿篱将损失分别减少到23%和7%,而没有覆盖的绿篱将损失减少到41%和17%。由于1990年4月的一次风暴的性质以及当时土壤易受侵蚀,土壤损失受到了很大的影响。处理间作物产量差异很小。绿篱处理在低于正常雨季略有降低豇豆产量,但在雨季提高了豇豆产量。