Reflection of N.Ya. Danilevsky’s ideas in the «National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation»

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
R. Savenkov
{"title":"Reflection of N.Ya. Danilevsky’s ideas in the «National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation»","authors":"R. Savenkov","doi":"10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-104-114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a comparative analysis by the method of actual reconstruction of some theses of the Russian philosopher N.Ya. Danilevsky formulated in the book \"Russia and Europe\" with the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the comparison is to find common ideas, the foundations of the project of the civilizational future of Russia. We need to solve the following tasks. Firstly, to describe what the alignment of forces is seen on the geopolitical map of the world from the 19th and 21st centuries. Secondly, to determine in the sources how the key goals of social development coincide, which is the main reference point for society. Thirdly, a comparison of the reasons for the hostile attitude of the “collective West” towards Russia. Fourth, the identification of Russia's main geopolitical adversaries and their methods of action. Fifth, a comparison of the understanding of the authors of different eras of the traditional mass values of Russians, which can become the basis of a sustainable social consensus and a driver of development. Sixth, in response to current geopolitical challenges, to determine models for the future existence of Russia and Ukraine. The study of texts by a comparative method confirms their similarity, traditional Slavic values and position on Ukraine coincide significantly. As a result of the analysis, the hypothesis is partially confirmed, since the identity of the description of the geopolitical situation and proposals does not prove the identity of the challenges facing Russia. Possibly a 19th century text and documents of the 21st century influenced by a historical geopolitical contradiction, reproducing a permanent conflict between two dissimilar cultural (civilizational) types. It would be promising to compare the image of Russia in the eyes of European contemporaries N. Danilevsky and V. Putin.","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-104-114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis by the method of actual reconstruction of some theses of the Russian philosopher N.Ya. Danilevsky formulated in the book "Russia and Europe" with the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the comparison is to find common ideas, the foundations of the project of the civilizational future of Russia. We need to solve the following tasks. Firstly, to describe what the alignment of forces is seen on the geopolitical map of the world from the 19th and 21st centuries. Secondly, to determine in the sources how the key goals of social development coincide, which is the main reference point for society. Thirdly, a comparison of the reasons for the hostile attitude of the “collective West” towards Russia. Fourth, the identification of Russia's main geopolitical adversaries and their methods of action. Fifth, a comparison of the understanding of the authors of different eras of the traditional mass values of Russians, which can become the basis of a sustainable social consensus and a driver of development. Sixth, in response to current geopolitical challenges, to determine models for the future existence of Russia and Ukraine. The study of texts by a comparative method confirms their similarity, traditional Slavic values and position on Ukraine coincide significantly. As a result of the analysis, the hypothesis is partially confirmed, since the identity of the description of the geopolitical situation and proposals does not prove the identity of the challenges facing Russia. Possibly a 19th century text and documents of the 21st century influenced by a historical geopolitical contradiction, reproducing a permanent conflict between two dissimilar cultural (civilizational) types. It would be promising to compare the image of Russia in the eyes of European contemporaries N. Danilevsky and V. Putin.
N.Ya的倒影。丹尼列夫斯基在《俄罗斯联邦国家安全战略》中的观点
本文通过对俄罗斯哲学家涅亚的一些论点进行实际重构的方法,对其进行比较分析。丹尼列夫斯基在《俄罗斯与欧洲》一书中阐述了俄罗斯联邦的国家安全战略。比较的目的是找到共同的想法,这是俄罗斯文明未来项目的基础。我们需要解决以下任务。首先,描述从19世纪到21世纪的世界地缘政治地图上所看到的力量联盟。其次,在来源中确定社会发展的关键目标如何一致,这是社会的主要参考点。第三,比较“集体西方”对俄敌对态度的原因。第四,确定俄罗斯的主要地缘政治对手及其行动方式。第五,比较不同时代的作者对俄罗斯传统大众价值观的理解,这可以成为可持续社会共识的基础和发展的动力。第六,为应对当前的地缘政治挑战,确定俄罗斯和乌克兰未来存在的模式。用比较的方法对文本进行研究,证实了它们的相似性,传统的斯拉夫价值观和对乌克兰的立场显著一致。作为分析的结果,这一假设得到了部分证实,因为对地缘政治形势和建议的描述的同一性并不能证明俄罗斯面临的挑战的同一性。可能是19世纪的文本和21世纪的文件,受到历史地缘政治矛盾的影响,再现了两种不同文化(文明)类型之间的永久冲突。比较一下同时代的欧洲人达尼列夫斯基和普京眼中的俄罗斯形象,会很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信