How do they fit together? A case study of Neolithic pottery typology and radiocarbon chronology

Q3 Social Sciences
Archivaria Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI:10.35686/ar.2020.6
F. Trampota, Petr Květina
{"title":"How do they fit together?\nA case study of Neolithic pottery typology\nand radiocarbon chronology","authors":"F. Trampota, Petr Květina","doi":"10.35686/ar.2020.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of the paper is to update the current concept of the chronology of the Neolithic (c. 5400–3300 BC) of the Czech Republic and northern Lower Austria by comparing the typo-chronological development of pottery and modelling the corresponding radiocarbon dates. Up until now, pottery and its style have often\nbeen perceived in Central Europe as “basic indicators” of archaeological cultures or pottery traditions, which are then further divided into chronological stages and phases. And yet, an analysis of the relationships of all three levels of these entities in the context of four types of models of radiocarbon dates indicates that changes in the original material culture do not necessarily occur on a time axis. While it is true that\narchaeological cultures have proven to be the robust materialisation of primarily chronological trends valid in larger geographic areas, at the level of general and more detailed pottery groups, development can be manifested in other ways (regionally, socially or in a way that is difficult to interpret).\n\nCentral Europe – Neolithic – pottery typo-chronology – archaeological culture – radiocarbon dating","PeriodicalId":35881,"journal":{"name":"Archivaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2020.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The object of the paper is to update the current concept of the chronology of the Neolithic (c. 5400–3300 BC) of the Czech Republic and northern Lower Austria by comparing the typo-chronological development of pottery and modelling the corresponding radiocarbon dates. Up until now, pottery and its style have often been perceived in Central Europe as “basic indicators” of archaeological cultures or pottery traditions, which are then further divided into chronological stages and phases. And yet, an analysis of the relationships of all three levels of these entities in the context of four types of models of radiocarbon dates indicates that changes in the original material culture do not necessarily occur on a time axis. While it is true that archaeological cultures have proven to be the robust materialisation of primarily chronological trends valid in larger geographic areas, at the level of general and more detailed pottery groups, development can be manifested in other ways (regionally, socially or in a way that is difficult to interpret). Central Europe – Neolithic – pottery typo-chronology – archaeological culture – radiocarbon dating
它们是如何结合在一起的?新石器时代陶器类型与放射性碳年代学的个案研究
本文的目的是通过比较陶器的印刷年代发展和模拟相应的放射性碳年代,来更新目前关于捷克共和国和奥地利北部新石器时代(公元前5400-3300年)的年代学概念。到目前为止,陶器及其风格在中欧经常被视为考古文化或陶器传统的“基本指标”,然后进一步划分为年代阶段和阶段。然而,在四种放射性碳测年模型的背景下,对这些实体的所有三个层次的关系进行的分析表明,原始物质文化的变化不一定发生在时间轴上。虽然考古文化已被证明是在更大的地理区域内有效的主要时间趋势的有力物化,但在一般和更详细的陶器群体水平上,发展可以以其他方式表现出来(区域,社会或难以解释的方式)。中欧-新石器时代-陶器类型-年表-考古文化-放射性碳定年法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivaria
Archivaria Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信