Searching for prosperity a comment

Danny Quah
{"title":"Searching for prosperity a comment","authors":"Danny Quah","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00061-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Kremer, Onatski, and Stock (KOS) criticize twin peaks dynamics in the evolution of cross-country income dynamics. They suggest instead convergence to a single peak at high incomes, with a prolonged transition when polarization and inequality increase. This article makes three points. First, the data are as consistent with a twin peaks characterization as they are for KOS's preferred description—in KOS's own analysis as well as across other studies. Second, the substantive economic message is identical in both twin peaks and KOS views: the global poor are substantial and will continue so—whether for centuries or for infinity is nit-picking. Finally, getting the empirics right matters greatly for theories of economic growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 305-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00061-6","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223101000616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Kremer, Onatski, and Stock (KOS) criticize twin peaks dynamics in the evolution of cross-country income dynamics. They suggest instead convergence to a single peak at high incomes, with a prolonged transition when polarization and inequality increase. This article makes three points. First, the data are as consistent with a twin peaks characterization as they are for KOS's preferred description—in KOS's own analysis as well as across other studies. Second, the substantive economic message is identical in both twin peaks and KOS views: the global poor are substantial and will continue so—whether for centuries or for infinity is nit-picking. Finally, getting the empirics right matters greatly for theories of economic growth.

寻找繁荣的评论
克雷默、奥纳茨基和斯托克(KOS)批评了跨国收入动态演变中的双峰动态。相反,他们认为,高收入人群会趋同于一个单一的峰值,当两极分化和不平等加剧时,过渡会持续很长时间。这篇文章提出了三点。首先,在KOS自己的分析和其他研究中,数据与KOS首选描述的双峰特征一致。其次,在双峰和科斯的观点中,实质性的经济信息是相同的:全球贫困人口数量庞大,而且将继续如此——无论是几个世纪还是无穷无尽,都是吹毛求疵的。最后,获得正确的经验对于经济增长理论至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信