When Constructs Become Obsolete: A Systematic Approach to Evaluating and Updating Constructs for Information Systems Research

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2022-05-18 DOI:10.25300/misq/2022/15516
Deborah R. Compeau, John Correia, J. Thatcher
{"title":"When Constructs Become Obsolete: A Systematic Approach to Evaluating and Updating Constructs for Information Systems Research","authors":"Deborah R. Compeau, John Correia, J. Thatcher","doi":"10.25300/misq/2022/15516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we confront a paradox in the IS literature that even though our field focuses on the rapid pace of technological change and the dramatic scale of technology-enabled organizational and societal changes, we sometimes find ourselves studying these changes using—largely without question—constructs that were developed in a vastly different IT, user, and organizational environment. We provide guidelines to help assess whether an existing construct warrants updating and to structure the updating task if it is undertaken. Our three-step process provides for a theoretically grounded and comprehensive method that ensures we balance the need for construct updating against the need to sustain our cumulative tradition. We illustrate our guidelines using computer self-efficacy (CSE) as a case study. We document each of the steps involved in analyzing, reconceptualizing, and testing the revised construct information technology self-efficacy (ITSE). Our analyses show that the new construct better explains both traditional and contemporary constructs with a traditional (postal survey) and contemporary (online panel) sample. We discuss the implications of our work both for research on self-efficacy and more broadly for future updating of other important constructs.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"12 1","pages":"679-712"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2022/15516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper, we confront a paradox in the IS literature that even though our field focuses on the rapid pace of technological change and the dramatic scale of technology-enabled organizational and societal changes, we sometimes find ourselves studying these changes using—largely without question—constructs that were developed in a vastly different IT, user, and organizational environment. We provide guidelines to help assess whether an existing construct warrants updating and to structure the updating task if it is undertaken. Our three-step process provides for a theoretically grounded and comprehensive method that ensures we balance the need for construct updating against the need to sustain our cumulative tradition. We illustrate our guidelines using computer self-efficacy (CSE) as a case study. We document each of the steps involved in analyzing, reconceptualizing, and testing the revised construct information technology self-efficacy (ITSE). Our analyses show that the new construct better explains both traditional and contemporary constructs with a traditional (postal survey) and contemporary (online panel) sample. We discuss the implications of our work both for research on self-efficacy and more broadly for future updating of other important constructs.
当结构过时:评估和更新信息系统研究结构的系统方法
在本文中,我们面对了信息系统文献中的一个悖论,即尽管我们的领域关注的是技术变革的快速步伐和技术驱动的组织和社会变革的巨大规模,但我们有时发现自己在研究这些变化时,使用的结构(很大程度上毫无疑问)是在一个截然不同的IT、用户和组织环境中开发的。我们提供了指导方针,以帮助评估现有结构是否需要更新,并在进行更新任务时组织更新任务。我们的三步流程提供了一种理论基础和全面的方法,确保我们在结构更新的需要和维持累积传统的需要之间取得平衡。我们使用计算机自我效能(CSE)作为案例研究来说明我们的指导方针。我们记录了分析、重新概念化和测试修订后的信息技术自我效能(ITSE)的每个步骤。我们的分析表明,新结构更好地解释了传统(邮政调查)和当代(在线面板)样本的传统和当代结构。我们讨论了我们的工作对自我效能的研究以及更广泛地对其他重要构念的未来更新的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信