Philosophy of EOR

T. Babadagli
{"title":"Philosophy of EOR","authors":"T. Babadagli","doi":"10.2118/196362-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper seeks answers, through a ‘philosophical’ approach, to the questions of whether enhanced oil recovery projects are purely driven by economic restrictions (i.e. oil prices) or if there are still technical issues to be considered, making companies refrain from enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Another way of approaching these questions is to ask why some EOR projects are successful and long-lasting regardless of substantial fluctuations in oil prices. To find solid answers to these two, by ‘philosophical’ reasoning, further questions were raised including: (1) has sufficient attention been given to the ‘cheapest’ EOR methods such as air and microbial injection, (2) why are we afraid of the most expensive miscible processes that yield high recoveries in the long run, or (3) why is the incubation period (research to field) of EOR projects so lengthy? After a detailed analysis using sustainable EOR example cases and identifying the myths and facts about EOR, both answers to these questions and supportive data were sought.\n Premises were listed as outcomes to be considered in the decision making and development of EOR projects. Examples of said considerations include: (1) Every EOR process is case-specific and analogies are difficult to make, hence we still need serious efforts for project design and research for specific processes and technologies, (2) discontinuity in fundamental and case-specific research has been one of the essential reasons preventing the continuity of the projects rather than drops in oil prices, and (3) any EOR project can be made economical, if technical success is proven, through proper optimization methods and continuous project monitoring whilst considering the minimal profit that the company can tolerate.\n Finally, through the ‘philosophical’ reasoning approach and using worldwide successful EOR cases, the following three parameters were found to be the most important factors in running successful EOR applications, regardless of oil prices and risky investment costs, to extend the life span of the reservoir and warrant both short and long-term profit: (1) Proper technical design and implementation of the selected EOR method through continuous monitoring and re-engineering the project (how to apply more than what to apply), (2) good reservoir characterization and geological descriptions and their effect on the mechanics of the EOR process, and (3) paying attention to experience and expertise (human factor).\n It is believed that the systematic analysis and philosophical approach followed in this paper and the outcome will provide proper guidance to EOR projects for upcoming decades.","PeriodicalId":11089,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196362-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

This paper seeks answers, through a ‘philosophical’ approach, to the questions of whether enhanced oil recovery projects are purely driven by economic restrictions (i.e. oil prices) or if there are still technical issues to be considered, making companies refrain from enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Another way of approaching these questions is to ask why some EOR projects are successful and long-lasting regardless of substantial fluctuations in oil prices. To find solid answers to these two, by ‘philosophical’ reasoning, further questions were raised including: (1) has sufficient attention been given to the ‘cheapest’ EOR methods such as air and microbial injection, (2) why are we afraid of the most expensive miscible processes that yield high recoveries in the long run, or (3) why is the incubation period (research to field) of EOR projects so lengthy? After a detailed analysis using sustainable EOR example cases and identifying the myths and facts about EOR, both answers to these questions and supportive data were sought. Premises were listed as outcomes to be considered in the decision making and development of EOR projects. Examples of said considerations include: (1) Every EOR process is case-specific and analogies are difficult to make, hence we still need serious efforts for project design and research for specific processes and technologies, (2) discontinuity in fundamental and case-specific research has been one of the essential reasons preventing the continuity of the projects rather than drops in oil prices, and (3) any EOR project can be made economical, if technical success is proven, through proper optimization methods and continuous project monitoring whilst considering the minimal profit that the company can tolerate. Finally, through the ‘philosophical’ reasoning approach and using worldwide successful EOR cases, the following three parameters were found to be the most important factors in running successful EOR applications, regardless of oil prices and risky investment costs, to extend the life span of the reservoir and warrant both short and long-term profit: (1) Proper technical design and implementation of the selected EOR method through continuous monitoring and re-engineering the project (how to apply more than what to apply), (2) good reservoir characterization and geological descriptions and their effect on the mechanics of the EOR process, and (3) paying attention to experience and expertise (human factor). It is believed that the systematic analysis and philosophical approach followed in this paper and the outcome will provide proper guidance to EOR projects for upcoming decades.
提高采收率的理念
本文通过“哲学”的方法来寻求答案,以解决提高采收率项目是否纯粹受到经济限制(即油价)的驱动,或者是否仍然存在需要考虑的技术问题,使公司避免提高采收率(EOR)应用。解决这些问题的另一种方法是问为什么一些EOR项目在油价大幅波动的情况下仍然成功且持久。为了找到这两个问题的可靠答案,通过“哲学”推理,提出了进一步的问题,包括:(1)是否对“最便宜”的提高采收率方法(如空气和微生物注射)给予了足够的关注,(2)为什么我们害怕最昂贵的混相工艺,从长远来看可以产生高回收率,或者(3)为什么提高采收率项目的潜伏期(从研究到现场)如此之长?在详细分析了可持续提高采收率的案例,并确定了有关提高采收率的神话和事实之后,我们寻求了这些问题的答案和支持性数据。在EOR项目的决策和开发中,房舍被列为要考虑的结果。上述考虑因素的例子包括:(1)每一种提高采收率工艺都是个案化的,很难进行类比,因此我们仍然需要认真地对具体的工艺和技术进行项目设计和研究;(2)基础和个案研究的不连续性一直是阻碍项目连续性而不是油价下降的重要原因之一;(3)任何提高采收率项目都可以在技术成功的情况下实现经济效益。通过适当的优化方法和持续的项目监控,同时考虑到公司可以承受的最小利润。最后,通过“哲学”推理方法和使用世界范围内成功的EOR案例,发现以下三个参数是成功进行EOR应用的最重要因素,无论油价和风险投资成本如何,都可以延长油藏的使用寿命,并保证短期和长期的利润。(1)通过持续监测和重新设计项目,对所选的提高采收率方法进行适当的技术设计和实施(如何应用比应用什么更多);(2)良好的储层表征和地质描述及其对提高采收率过程机理的影响;(3)注重经验和专业知识(人为因素)。相信本文所采用的系统分析和哲学方法及其结果将为未来几十年的提高采收率项目提供适当的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信