The teaching of electroacupuncture in North America: an informal survey

David F. Mayor MA, BAc, MBAcC, MMAA, MAACP (Assoc)
{"title":"The teaching of electroacupuncture in North America: an informal survey","authors":"David F. Mayor MA, BAc, MBAcC, MMAA, MAACP (Assoc)","doi":"10.1054/caom.2001.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objectives:ÊTo determine whether electroacupuncture (EA) is taught in Oriental Medicine (OM), Chiropractic (Chir), Physical Therapy (PT) and Osteopathic (Osteop) colleges in the USA, what position it holds in the overall curriculum, what are thought to be its most useful applications (vis-à-vis those of manual acupuncture, MA), and whether certain treatment parameters are considered as having particular effects.</p><p>Methods:ÊQuestionnaires were mailed, faxed or emailed to the different colleges, and results analysed informally.</p><p>Results and conclusions:ÊDespite lack of formal analysis, it is clear that EA in some form is taught in many OM and some PT schools, and at least a few Chir (but probably no Osteop) colleges. More time is devoted to it in OM than PT trainings, and the scope of practice for EA is taught as much wider in OM than PT, with a corresponding emphasis on a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) approach in the former, and trigger point (TrP) stimulation in the latter (using noninvasive methods). It tends to be taught as more effective than MA for pain, neuropathy, paralysis and addiction. Least agreement appears to be in the area of treatment parameters to be used, and their effects. There is a possible trend for different schools to recommend textbooks written by members of their associated profession. Further results are discussed in detail.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 116-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2001.0084","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144901900842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives:ÊTo determine whether electroacupuncture (EA) is taught in Oriental Medicine (OM), Chiropractic (Chir), Physical Therapy (PT) and Osteopathic (Osteop) colleges in the USA, what position it holds in the overall curriculum, what are thought to be its most useful applications (vis-à-vis those of manual acupuncture, MA), and whether certain treatment parameters are considered as having particular effects.

Methods:ÊQuestionnaires were mailed, faxed or emailed to the different colleges, and results analysed informally.

Results and conclusions:ÊDespite lack of formal analysis, it is clear that EA in some form is taught in many OM and some PT schools, and at least a few Chir (but probably no Osteop) colleges. More time is devoted to it in OM than PT trainings, and the scope of practice for EA is taught as much wider in OM than PT, with a corresponding emphasis on a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) approach in the former, and trigger point (TrP) stimulation in the latter (using noninvasive methods). It tends to be taught as more effective than MA for pain, neuropathy, paralysis and addiction. Least agreement appears to be in the area of treatment parameters to be used, and their effects. There is a possible trend for different schools to recommend textbooks written by members of their associated profession. Further results are discussed in detail.

北美电针教学:非正式调查
目的:ÊTo确定电针(EA)是否在美国的东方医学(OM)、脊椎指压治疗(Chir)、物理治疗(PT)和整骨疗法(Osteop)学院中教授,电针在整个课程中占据什么位置,电针最有用的应用是什么(相对于-à-vis手工针灸,MA),以及某些治疗参数是否被认为具有特殊效果。方法:通过邮寄、传真或电子邮件(ÊQuestionnaires)等方式,对调查结果进行非正式分析。结果和结论:ÊDespite缺乏正式的分析,很明显,在许多OM和一些PT学校,以及至少一些Chir(但可能没有骨科)学院中,以某种形式教授EA。OM比PT培训投入更多的时间,OM的EA实践范围比PT更广泛,前者强调传统中医(TCM)方法,后者强调触发点(TrP)刺激(使用无创方法)。在治疗疼痛、神经病变、麻痹和成瘾方面,它往往被认为比MA更有效。在将要使用的治疗参数及其效果方面,似乎意见最不一致。不同的学校可能会推荐由他们相关专业的成员编写的教科书。进一步的结果进行了详细讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信