Metrics and Methods for Evaluating Learning Outcomes and Learner Interactions in Robotics-Enabled STEM Education

S. Rahman
{"title":"Metrics and Methods for Evaluating Learning Outcomes and Learner Interactions in Robotics-Enabled STEM Education","authors":"S. Rahman","doi":"10.1109/AIM43001.2020.9158900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to develop the metrics and methods for evaluating the learning outcomes and interactions of learners with robotic devices in robotics-enabled STEM education. For the learning outcomes, a survey was conducted with 20 middle school math and science teachers who received training on how to design, develop and implement roboticsenabled STEM lessons. Each teacher had also experience of implementing robot-enabled STEM lessons in actual classroom environment. The participating teachers responded the survey based on their training, classroom experience and observations, and self-brainstorming. The survey responses were then analyzed and the appropriate and comprehensive assessment metrics and methods for the learning outcomes of students were determined. The results showed that the expected learning outcomes were related not only to the educational gains, but also to the improvements in the behavioral, social, scientific, cognitive and intellectual aptitudes of students (learners). Validation and generalization procedures of the developed assessment metrics and methods were discussed. For the learner interactions, investigations were made when selected engineering students were learning fundamental mechanical engineering concepts using a specially designed robotic platform. Based on survey and observations, a set of criteria as well as their assessment methods were proposed that can be used to evaluate appropriate interactions between learners and learning tools (robotics devices) while learners learn with the learning tools. The proposed evaluation schemes can significantly justify the benefits and advantages of robot-enabled STEM education, benchmark the outcomes, ensure appropriate interactions between learners and learning devices, help improve preparations of instructors and teaching institutions, motivate education decision-makers to confer on robot-enabled STEM education and curricula development, and thus can promote the overall robot-enabled STEM education practices in K-16 education.","PeriodicalId":73326,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics : [proceedings]. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics","volume":"132 1","pages":"2103-2108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics : [proceedings]. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM43001.2020.9158900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper attempts to develop the metrics and methods for evaluating the learning outcomes and interactions of learners with robotic devices in robotics-enabled STEM education. For the learning outcomes, a survey was conducted with 20 middle school math and science teachers who received training on how to design, develop and implement roboticsenabled STEM lessons. Each teacher had also experience of implementing robot-enabled STEM lessons in actual classroom environment. The participating teachers responded the survey based on their training, classroom experience and observations, and self-brainstorming. The survey responses were then analyzed and the appropriate and comprehensive assessment metrics and methods for the learning outcomes of students were determined. The results showed that the expected learning outcomes were related not only to the educational gains, but also to the improvements in the behavioral, social, scientific, cognitive and intellectual aptitudes of students (learners). Validation and generalization procedures of the developed assessment metrics and methods were discussed. For the learner interactions, investigations were made when selected engineering students were learning fundamental mechanical engineering concepts using a specially designed robotic platform. Based on survey and observations, a set of criteria as well as their assessment methods were proposed that can be used to evaluate appropriate interactions between learners and learning tools (robotics devices) while learners learn with the learning tools. The proposed evaluation schemes can significantly justify the benefits and advantages of robot-enabled STEM education, benchmark the outcomes, ensure appropriate interactions between learners and learning devices, help improve preparations of instructors and teaching institutions, motivate education decision-makers to confer on robot-enabled STEM education and curricula development, and thus can promote the overall robot-enabled STEM education practices in K-16 education.
在机器人支持的STEM教育中评估学习成果和学习者互动的指标和方法
本文试图开发用于评估机器人STEM教育中学习者与机器人设备的学习成果和互动的指标和方法。对于学习成果,对20名中学数学和科学教师进行了一项调查,他们接受了如何设计、开发和实施机器人支持的STEM课程的培训。每位老师都有在实际课堂环境中实施机器人STEM课程的经验。参与调查的教师根据他们的培训、课堂经验和观察以及自我头脑风暴来回答调查。然后对调查结果进行分析,确定适合学生学习成果的综合评估指标和方法。结果表明,期望学习成果不仅与教育收益有关,还与学生(学习者)在行为、社会、科学、认知和智力等方面的能力提高有关。讨论了开发的评估指标和方法的验证和推广程序。对于学习者的互动,当选定的工程学生使用专门设计的机器人平台学习基本机械工程概念时,进行了调查。基于调查和观察,提出了一套标准及其评估方法,可用于评估学习者与学习工具(机器人设备)之间的适当互动,同时学习者使用学习工具进行学习。所提出的评估方案可以显著地证明机器人STEM教育的好处和优势,对结果进行基准测试,确保学习者和学习设备之间的适当互动,有助于改善教师和教学机构的准备工作,激励教育决策者对机器人STEM教育和课程开发进行授权,从而可以促进K-16教育中机器人STEM教育的整体实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信