Dualisme Lembaga Pendidika di Indonesia

Suryoto, Munzir Hitami, Edy Yusrianto
{"title":"Dualisme Lembaga Pendidika di Indonesia","authors":"Suryoto, Munzir Hitami, Edy Yusrianto","doi":"10.58569/jies.v1i2.582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The terms dualism and dichotomy have the same meaning, namely the separation between general education and religious education. Dichotomy always gives rise to different views on one side and equality on the other. The dichotomous view essentially ignores the essence or value of the spirit of education. Differentiating and equating are more interpreted at the surface level so that it clearly damages the spirit value of Islamic education. Dualism and dichotomy are not only at the level of segregation, but have entered the area of separation which in practice separates general subjects from religious subjects, public schools and madrasas which are managed separately. The climax was when the New Order government issued a Joint Decree (SKB) on March 24, 1975 which confirmed the separation to date. The impact was detrimental and the meaning of Islam became narrower because the compartmentalization of knowledge ultimately subordinated and neglected Islamic education. As an alternative solution, efforts to integrate knowledge and repositioning must be followed, namely the perspective of Islamic sciences in their true position.","PeriodicalId":31455,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Journal of Islamic Education Studies","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Journal of Islamic Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58569/jies.v1i2.582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The terms dualism and dichotomy have the same meaning, namely the separation between general education and religious education. Dichotomy always gives rise to different views on one side and equality on the other. The dichotomous view essentially ignores the essence or value of the spirit of education. Differentiating and equating are more interpreted at the surface level so that it clearly damages the spirit value of Islamic education. Dualism and dichotomy are not only at the level of segregation, but have entered the area of separation which in practice separates general subjects from religious subjects, public schools and madrasas which are managed separately. The climax was when the New Order government issued a Joint Decree (SKB) on March 24, 1975 which confirmed the separation to date. The impact was detrimental and the meaning of Islam became narrower because the compartmentalization of knowledge ultimately subordinated and neglected Islamic education. As an alternative solution, efforts to integrate knowledge and repositioning must be followed, namely the perspective of Islamic sciences in their true position.
二元论和二分法具有相同的含义,即普通教育与宗教教育的分离。二分法总是导致一方观点不同,另一方观点平等。这种二分法实质上忽视了教育精神的本质或价值。区分和等同更多的是在表面层面上进行解释,因此它明显损害了伊斯兰教育的精神价值。二元论和二分法不仅在隔离的层面上,而且已经进入分离的领域,实际上将一般科目与分开管理的宗教科目、公立学校和伊斯兰学校分开。高潮是新秩序政府于1975年3月24日发布联合法令(SKB),确认了迄今为止的分离。这种影响是有害的,伊斯兰教的意义变得更加狭隘,因为知识的划分最终使伊斯兰教育处于从属地位,并被忽视了。作为一种替代解决方案,必须努力整合知识和重新定位,即伊斯兰科学的观点处于其真正的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信