"Read Much?"—"Depends. Who Wants to Know?": A Closer Look at Time as One Possible Parameter to Quantify European Reading Habits

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Owena Reinke, Christoph Bläsi
{"title":"\"Read Much?\"—\"Depends. Who Wants to Know?\": A Closer Look at Time as One Possible Parameter to Quantify European Reading Habits","authors":"Owena Reinke, Christoph Bläsi","doi":"10.5325/reception.15.1.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Reading is the topic of many surveys throughout Europe. Despite plenty of data on reading habits available, the comparison of these individual results between countries is often obstructed by the different methodological approaches applied. While the aim of the majority can be said to have the top-level question—\"How much do our people read?\"—in common, each of the survey designs represents a different answer to the question \"How can we measure this?\" This heterogenous field of survey designs is a consequence of the fact that from country to country, the organizations initiating surveys have different professional backgrounds: Whether it is governmental institutions, associations in the book trade, or NGOs, this has an impact on the choice of parameters. A brief look at some numbers available about the \"time spent on reading\" illustrates this correlation.","PeriodicalId":40584,"journal":{"name":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","volume":"290 1","pages":"73 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/reception.15.1.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Reading is the topic of many surveys throughout Europe. Despite plenty of data on reading habits available, the comparison of these individual results between countries is often obstructed by the different methodological approaches applied. While the aim of the majority can be said to have the top-level question—"How much do our people read?"—in common, each of the survey designs represents a different answer to the question "How can we measure this?" This heterogenous field of survey designs is a consequence of the fact that from country to country, the organizations initiating surveys have different professional backgrounds: Whether it is governmental institutions, associations in the book trade, or NGOs, this has an impact on the choice of parameters. A brief look at some numbers available about the "time spent on reading" illustrates this correlation.
“读书多吗?”——“视情况而定。谁想知道?:对时间作为量化欧洲阅读习惯的一个可能参数的进一步观察
阅读是欧洲许多调查的主题。尽管有大量关于阅读习惯的数据,但不同国家之间对这些个别结果的比较往往受到不同方法方法的阻碍。而大多数人的目标可以说是有一个最高级别的问题——“我们的人读多少书?”通常,每个调查设计都代表了“我们如何衡量这个?”这个问题的不同答案。这种调查设计的异质领域是由于各国发起调查的组织具有不同的专业背景:无论是政府机构、图书贸易协会还是非政府组织,这对参数的选择都有影响。简单看一下关于“花在阅读上的时间”的一些数据就可以说明这种相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History
Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Reception: Texts, Readers, Audiences, History is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published once a year. It seeks to promote dialog and discussion among scholars engaged in theoretical and practical analyses in several related fields: reader-response criticism and pedagogy, reception study, history of reading and the book, audience and communication studies, institutional studies and histories, as well as interpretive strategies related to feminism, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly but not exclusively on the literature, culture, and media of England and the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信