Comparative Studies Between Hydrothermal Carbonation and Torrefaction for Biofuel Production from Poultry Litter

R. Isemin, A. Mikhalev, O. Milovanov, D. Klimov, N. Muratova, K. Krysanova, Yu. A. Teplitskii, A. Greben′kov, V. Kogh-Tatarenko
{"title":"Comparative Studies Between Hydrothermal Carbonation and Torrefaction for Biofuel Production from Poultry Litter","authors":"R. Isemin, A. Mikhalev, O. Milovanov, D. Klimov, N. Muratova, K. Krysanova, Yu. A. Teplitskii, A. Greben′kov, V. Kogh-Tatarenko","doi":"10.1145/3314367.3314372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of comparative experiments on the production of biofuel from poultry litter (PL) by the method of low-temperature pyrolysis (Torrefaction) and hydrothermal carbonization are presented. Comparison of the obtained results shows that as a result of hydrothermal carbonation of PL (processing temperature 180-210 °C, treatment time 240 minutes), the carbon content in the manure can be increased by 1.35 times, and the oxygen content is reduced in 2.2 times, the lower heat of combustion of the fuel obtained, which is similar in its characteristics to lignites, can be increased by 1.25 times to 19.7 MJ/kg. As a result of low-temperature pyrolysis in the fluidized bed at a temperature of 300 °C in a nitrogen medium and superheated water vapor, the carbon content can be increased by 1.16 times, and the oxygen content is reduced in 2.8 times. The lowest heat of combustion of the fuel produced can be increase by 1.13 times to 18.8 MJ/kg. Considering that the technology of PL treatment by low-temperature pyrolysis in the fluidized bed requires significantly less processing time (360-480 seconds), this technology can be fully considered as an alternative to hydrothermal carbonization.","PeriodicalId":20485,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics - ICBBB '19","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics - ICBBB '19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3314367.3314372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The results of comparative experiments on the production of biofuel from poultry litter (PL) by the method of low-temperature pyrolysis (Torrefaction) and hydrothermal carbonization are presented. Comparison of the obtained results shows that as a result of hydrothermal carbonation of PL (processing temperature 180-210 °C, treatment time 240 minutes), the carbon content in the manure can be increased by 1.35 times, and the oxygen content is reduced in 2.2 times, the lower heat of combustion of the fuel obtained, which is similar in its characteristics to lignites, can be increased by 1.25 times to 19.7 MJ/kg. As a result of low-temperature pyrolysis in the fluidized bed at a temperature of 300 °C in a nitrogen medium and superheated water vapor, the carbon content can be increased by 1.16 times, and the oxygen content is reduced in 2.8 times. The lowest heat of combustion of the fuel produced can be increase by 1.13 times to 18.8 MJ/kg. Considering that the technology of PL treatment by low-temperature pyrolysis in the fluidized bed requires significantly less processing time (360-480 seconds), this technology can be fully considered as an alternative to hydrothermal carbonization.
水热碳化与焙烧禽畜粪便生产生物燃料的比较研究
介绍了低温热解(Torrefaction)和水热炭化(hydrothermal carbonization)两种方法对禽畜垃圾(PL)生产生物燃料的对比实验结果。结果表明,通过水热碳化(处理温度180 ~ 210℃,处理时间240 min),粪中碳含量可提高1.35倍,氧含量降低2.2倍,所得燃料的低燃烧热达到19.7 MJ/kg,其特性与褐煤相似,可提高1.25倍。在流化床中以氮气和过热水蒸气为介质,温度为300℃进行低温热解,碳含量可提高1.16倍,氧含量可降低2.8倍。产生的燃料的最低燃烧热可提高1.13倍,达到18.8 MJ/kg。考虑到流化床低温热解处理PL所需的处理时间(360-480秒)显著缩短,完全可以考虑将该技术作为水热炭化的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信