A systematic review of the use of environmental economics in the mining industry

IF 0.7 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
M. Menegaki, D. Damigos
{"title":"A systematic review of the use of environmental economics in the mining industry","authors":"M. Menegaki, D. Damigos","doi":"10.46873/2300-3960.1034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental economics is increasingly being used in project appraisals, environmental liability estimates and design of market-based instruments. Mining, an actor capable of causing adverse effects on the environment, human health and well-being, has already been affected by these developments, at a great extent. Up to date, several research studies have been carried out to monetise the externalities of mining projects. Nevertheless, a systematic review of these publications has not been carried out, yet. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by investigating (i) the main non-market valuation techniques used; (ii) the main external costs or benefits of mining projects monetised; and (iii) the monetary estimates of mining-related externalities. The analysis shows that practically all economic valuation techniques have been implemented towards assessing, in monetary terms, the mining impacts on the environment. However, the findings from the statistical analysis reveal a wide range of monetary estimates, which are attributed not only to the valuation methods and assumptions used but also to the specific characteristics of the mining projects in question. Also, the research draws directions for future work, as the analysis of the published studies indicates areas of limited availability of estimates or high heterogeneity between the available estimates.","PeriodicalId":37284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","volume":"58 1","pages":"254-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Environmental economics is increasingly being used in project appraisals, environmental liability estimates and design of market-based instruments. Mining, an actor capable of causing adverse effects on the environment, human health and well-being, has already been affected by these developments, at a great extent. Up to date, several research studies have been carried out to monetise the externalities of mining projects. Nevertheless, a systematic review of these publications has not been carried out, yet. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by investigating (i) the main non-market valuation techniques used; (ii) the main external costs or benefits of mining projects monetised; and (iii) the monetary estimates of mining-related externalities. The analysis shows that practically all economic valuation techniques have been implemented towards assessing, in monetary terms, the mining impacts on the environment. However, the findings from the statistical analysis reveal a wide range of monetary estimates, which are attributed not only to the valuation methods and assumptions used but also to the specific characteristics of the mining projects in question. Also, the research draws directions for future work, as the analysis of the published studies indicates areas of limited availability of estimates or high heterogeneity between the available estimates.
对环境经济学在采矿业中的应用进行系统审查
环境经济学越来越多地被用于项目评估、环境责任估计和基于市场的工具设计。采矿是一种能够对环境、人类健康和福祉造成不利影响的行为,已经在很大程度上受到这些发展的影响。到目前为止,已经进行了几项研究,以便将采矿项目的外部性货币化。然而,尚未对这些出版物进行系统审查。本文旨在通过调查(i)使用的主要非市场评估技术来填补这一文献空白;将采矿项目的主要外部成本或收益货币化;(三)与采矿有关的外部性的货币估计。分析表明,几乎所有的经济估价技术都是为了以货币来评价采矿对环境的影响。然而,统计分析的结果显示出各种各样的货币估计数,这不仅归因于所使用的估价方法和假设,而且也归因于所涉采矿项目的具体特点。此外,该研究为未来的工作指明了方向,因为对已发表的研究的分析指出了可用估计有限或可用估计之间高度异质性的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Journal of Sustainable Mining Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信