Research methods in sexuality research: A critical review of traditional ‘offline’ methods and ‘online’ methods, and the use of ‘solicited online diary blogs’

R. Greenhill, M. Sergeant
{"title":"Research methods in sexuality research: A critical review of traditional ‘offline’ methods and ‘online’ methods, and the use of ‘solicited online diary blogs’","authors":"R. Greenhill, M. Sergeant","doi":"10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers in the field of sexualities have adopted a variety of traditional research methods for many decades. Most of these offline methods, and some online methods, have been fraught with methodological difficulties such as biases, limited access to hidden groups, and even prohibitive costs, amongst others. This paper first provides a critical review of traditional offline research methods, as well as the contemporary online methods that have been developed since the advent of the internet. The challenges associated with the use of offline methods, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of some online methods, are discussed. This is followed by a review and discussion of ‘solicited online diary blogs’ as a contemporary research tool. It is proposed that solicited online diary blogs present researchers with a novel and advantageous tool that addresses some of the methodological challenges and limitations inherent in other research methods that are still widely used in the field of sexuality.","PeriodicalId":91790,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sexualities review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sexualities review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Researchers in the field of sexualities have adopted a variety of traditional research methods for many decades. Most of these offline methods, and some online methods, have been fraught with methodological difficulties such as biases, limited access to hidden groups, and even prohibitive costs, amongst others. This paper first provides a critical review of traditional offline research methods, as well as the contemporary online methods that have been developed since the advent of the internet. The challenges associated with the use of offline methods, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of some online methods, are discussed. This is followed by a review and discussion of ‘solicited online diary blogs’ as a contemporary research tool. It is proposed that solicited online diary blogs present researchers with a novel and advantageous tool that addresses some of the methodological challenges and limitations inherent in other research methods that are still widely used in the field of sexuality.
性研究中的研究方法:对传统“离线”方法和“在线”方法的批判性回顾,以及“征求在线日记博客”的使用
几十年来,性学领域的研究人员采用了各种传统的研究方法。大多数这些离线方法和一些在线方法都充满了方法上的困难,例如偏见,对隐藏群体的访问受限,甚至成本过高等等。本文首先对传统的离线研究方法以及自互联网出现以来发展起来的当代在线研究方法进行了批判性的回顾。讨论了与使用离线方法相关的挑战,以及一些在线方法的优点和缺点。接下来是对作为当代研究工具的“征求在线日记博客”的回顾和讨论。有人建议,在线日记博客为研究人员提供了一种新颖而有利的工具,可以解决其他研究方法中固有的一些方法上的挑战和局限性,这些方法仍然广泛应用于性研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信