Social Innovation, Experimentalism, and Public Governance: An Ethnographical Approach to Study Public Arenas in the City

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Carolina Andion
{"title":"Social Innovation, Experimentalism, and Public Governance: An Ethnographical Approach to Study Public Arenas in the City","authors":"Carolina Andion","doi":"10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study offers a new perspective on the relationship between social innovation and public governance. It drew inspiration from pragmatism, emphasizing the importance of public inquiry and democratic experimentalism. The perspective was applied and validated through a series of studies conducted within the framework of the Observatory of Social Innovation in Florianópolis, Brazil, since 2017. The study presented and discussed the findings and insights gained from observing the emergence and spread (or lack thereof) of social innovations in the city’s public arenas. It revisited the debate on public governance to establish a framework for the study of public action. It then identified gaps and improvements in the literature linking public governance and social innovation. Based on these previous discussions, the article proposes an approach to pragmatist ethnography of public arenas validated by empirical studies in Florianópolis. The results provide insights into how societal-state relations and modes of governance can facilitate or impede social innovation and the promotion of more democratic and sustainable cities. The study contributes to a better understanding of the interplay be-tween social innovation and public governance, and its implications for the development of more inclusive and sustainable cities.","PeriodicalId":53636,"journal":{"name":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study offers a new perspective on the relationship between social innovation and public governance. It drew inspiration from pragmatism, emphasizing the importance of public inquiry and democratic experimentalism. The perspective was applied and validated through a series of studies conducted within the framework of the Observatory of Social Innovation in Florianópolis, Brazil, since 2017. The study presented and discussed the findings and insights gained from observing the emergence and spread (or lack thereof) of social innovations in the city’s public arenas. It revisited the debate on public governance to establish a framework for the study of public action. It then identified gaps and improvements in the literature linking public governance and social innovation. Based on these previous discussions, the article proposes an approach to pragmatist ethnography of public arenas validated by empirical studies in Florianópolis. The results provide insights into how societal-state relations and modes of governance can facilitate or impede social innovation and the promotion of more democratic and sustainable cities. The study contributes to a better understanding of the interplay be-tween social innovation and public governance, and its implications for the development of more inclusive and sustainable cities.
社会创新、实验主义与公共治理:研究城市公共场所的民族志方法
本研究为社会创新与公共治理的关系提供了一个新的视角。它从实用主义中汲取灵感,强调公众调查和民主实验主义的重要性。自2017年以来,该观点在巴西Florianópolis社会创新观察站框架内进行了一系列研究,并得到了应用和验证。该研究展示并讨论了从观察城市公共领域社会创新的出现和传播(或缺乏)中获得的发现和见解。它重新讨论了关于公共治理的辩论,以建立一个研究公共行动的框架。然后,它确定了将公共治理与社会创新联系起来的文献中的差距和改进。在此基础上,本文提出了一种实用主义公共领域民族志的研究方法,并通过Florianópolis的实证研究进行了验证。研究结果为社会-国家关系和治理模式如何促进或阻碍社会创新以及促进更民主和可持续的城市提供了见解。该研究有助于更好地理解社会创新与公共治理之间的相互作用,及其对更具包容性和可持续性城市发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 2004, BAR has an international scope in terms of topics of interest, target audience, and editorial boards. It is an A2-journal according to the Brazilian classification Qualis/Capes, which is thus a strong signal about the quality of published works and about the transparency of the editorial process. BAR follows the editorial principles available in document Best Practices of Scientific Publication, an initiative championed by the Brazilian Academy of Management (ANPAD) that seeks to assist journals to achieve high scholarly standards and enhance their impact as sources for theoretical and applied research. Furthermore, since 2013, BAR is a member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), what is another signal of efforts made towards adhering to the most rigorous ethical principles in academic publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信