Effectivity of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Stenting vs Stenting Only for Difficult Common Biliary Duct Stones: A Retrospective Analysis

H. Maulahela, D. Rumagesan, M. Abdullah, D. Makmun, Kaka Renaldi, M. Simadibrata, H. Shatri, A. Fauzi
{"title":"Effectivity of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Stenting vs Stenting Only for Difficult Common Biliary Duct Stones: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"H. Maulahela, D. Rumagesan, M. Abdullah, D. Makmun, Kaka Renaldi, M. Simadibrata, H. Shatri, A. Fauzi","doi":"10.24871/241202323-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study is conducted to investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) after biliary stent placement compared to biliary stent placement alone in difficult common bile duct stones.Method: This is a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center Registry of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated 126 subjects with difficult bile stones. The subjects were divided into two groups: subjects subjected to biliary stent placement only and subjects who underwent ESWL procedure after the biliary stent placement. The effectiveness of the procedures was measured in the form of total clearance of bile stones.Results: A total of 126 subjects were included in this study, including 72 subjects who underwent ESWL procedure after biliary stent placement and 54 subjects who underwent biliary stent placement only. The effectiveness of ESWL after biliary stent placement in achieving total clearance was 69.1%, and the effectiveness of biliary stent placement in achieving total clearance was 64.8%. The ESWL procedure as adjuvant therapy after biliary stent placement did not provide a statistically significant difference (p = 0.703; 95% CI: 0.816–1.351). Normal body mass index was a factor that influences the effectiveness of ESWL after biliary stent placement (p = 0.002).Conclusion: The ESWL procedure as adjuvant therapy after biliary stent placement has the same level of effectiveness as biliary stent placement alone.","PeriodicalId":22564,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24871/241202323-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study is conducted to investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) after biliary stent placement compared to biliary stent placement alone in difficult common bile duct stones.Method: This is a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center Registry of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated 126 subjects with difficult bile stones. The subjects were divided into two groups: subjects subjected to biliary stent placement only and subjects who underwent ESWL procedure after the biliary stent placement. The effectiveness of the procedures was measured in the form of total clearance of bile stones.Results: A total of 126 subjects were included in this study, including 72 subjects who underwent ESWL procedure after biliary stent placement and 54 subjects who underwent biliary stent placement only. The effectiveness of ESWL after biliary stent placement in achieving total clearance was 69.1%, and the effectiveness of biliary stent placement in achieving total clearance was 64.8%. The ESWL procedure as adjuvant therapy after biliary stent placement did not provide a statistically significant difference (p = 0.703; 95% CI: 0.816–1.351). Normal body mass index was a factor that influences the effectiveness of ESWL after biliary stent placement (p = 0.002).Conclusion: The ESWL procedure as adjuvant therapy after biliary stent placement has the same level of effectiveness as biliary stent placement alone.
体外冲击波碎石联合支架置入与单纯支架置入治疗难治性胆总管结石的疗效:回顾性分析
背景:本研究旨在探讨胆总管支架置入术后体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与单独置入术治疗难治性胆总管结石的疗效。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了Cipto Mangunkusumo博士国立综合医院胃肠道内窥镜中心登记处的病历数据。我们回顾性评估了126例难治性胆结石患者。受试者被分为两组:仅行胆道支架置入术的受试者和胆道支架置入术后行ESWL的受试者。手术的有效性以胆结石总清除率的形式来衡量。结果:本研究共纳入126名受试者,其中72名受试者在胆道支架置入后行ESWL手术,54名受试者仅行胆道支架置入。胆道支架置入后ESWL达到总清除率的有效率为69.1%,胆道支架置入后ESWL达到总清除率的有效率为64.8%。ESWL手术作为胆道支架置入术后的辅助治疗没有统计学意义(p = 0.703;95% ci: 0.816-1.351)。正常体重指数是影响胆道支架置入术后ESWL效果的因素(p = 0.002)。结论:ESWL作为胆道支架置入术后的辅助治疗与单独置入术的效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信