Ethical implications of COVID-19 surveillance in Karnataka using Nancy Kass Framework

Apurva Jain, Lakshya Arora
{"title":"Ethical implications of COVID-19 surveillance in Karnataka using Nancy Kass Framework","authors":"Apurva Jain, Lakshya Arora","doi":"10.18785/jhe.1801.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous public health hurdles, including pandemics such as COVID-19, have led to concerns about community health practices in relation, necessitating the application of an ethical perspective. International research ethics guidelines are only used in a restricted range of contexts of public health. As a result, a variety of frameworks have been established to assist ethical analysis of public health concerns. In this study, we have used the Nancy Kass framework for analyzing COVID-19 surveillance in Karnataka state of India, which is a six-step approach that can assist public health practitioners in evaluating the ethical consequences of interventions, policy initiatives, services, and so on. In order to supervise the compliance of home quarantine, the government of Karnataka mandated uploading selfies as a digital tracking surveillance measure for the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these measures raised several ethical questions, especially related to an individual’s privacy, confidentiality, autonomy, and liberty. An established state surveillance mechanism with includes enforced measures for data security along with the moral duty of an individual to protect the health of the community can probably balance the principles of ethics.","PeriodicalId":89828,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of health ethics","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of health ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/jhe.1801.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous public health hurdles, including pandemics such as COVID-19, have led to concerns about community health practices in relation, necessitating the application of an ethical perspective. International research ethics guidelines are only used in a restricted range of contexts of public health. As a result, a variety of frameworks have been established to assist ethical analysis of public health concerns. In this study, we have used the Nancy Kass framework for analyzing COVID-19 surveillance in Karnataka state of India, which is a six-step approach that can assist public health practitioners in evaluating the ethical consequences of interventions, policy initiatives, services, and so on. In order to supervise the compliance of home quarantine, the government of Karnataka mandated uploading selfies as a digital tracking surveillance measure for the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these measures raised several ethical questions, especially related to an individual’s privacy, confidentiality, autonomy, and liberty. An established state surveillance mechanism with includes enforced measures for data security along with the moral duty of an individual to protect the health of the community can probably balance the principles of ethics.
使用Nancy Kass框架在卡纳塔克邦监测COVID-19的伦理影响
包括COVID-19等大流行病在内的许多公共卫生障碍导致人们对相关社区卫生做法感到担忧,因此有必要运用伦理观点。国际研究伦理准则仅在公共卫生的有限范围内使用。因此,建立了各种框架,以协助对公共卫生问题进行伦理分析。在本研究中,我们使用Nancy Kass框架来分析印度卡纳塔克邦的COVID-19监测,这是一个六步方法,可以帮助公共卫生从业人员评估干预措施、政策举措、服务等的伦理后果。为了监督家庭隔离的遵守情况,卡纳塔克邦政府要求上传自拍,作为新冠肺炎疫情的数字跟踪监测措施。然而,这些措施提出了几个伦理问题,特别是与个人隐私、保密、自主和自由有关的问题。既定的国家监督机制,包括强制执行的数据安全措施,以及个人保护社区健康的道德义务,可能可以平衡伦理原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信