Comparative evaluation of postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressings in patients of proximal tibia fracture managed by dual plating

P. Kothiyal, K. Vij, P. Gupta
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressings in patients of proximal tibia fracture managed by dual plating","authors":"P. Kothiyal, K. Vij, P. Gupta","doi":"10.4103/jotr.jotr_93_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: High-velocity injuries of the tibial plateau managed by operative intervention are often complicated by surgical site infections and delayed wound healing. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an established technique for the management of wound complications and is also being used nowadays for early healing of uncomplicated postoperative wounds. Materials and Methods: We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness of NPWT over conventional dressing methods by creating two groups of patients with tibial plateau fractures managed by plating. Postoperatively, NPWT was applied to one group and the other group was followed up with routine conventional dressings. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the study, and it was found that the rate of minor and major wound site complications was more in the group of patients managed by conventional dressing. Conclusion: With our study, we concluded that in high-velocity proximal tibia fractures with a lot of soft-tissue traumas, incisional NPWT is well tolerated and has shown a definitive advantage in preventing wound-related complications as compared to regular conventional dressing.","PeriodicalId":34195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation","volume":"8 1","pages":"12 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jotr.jotr_93_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-velocity injuries of the tibial plateau managed by operative intervention are often complicated by surgical site infections and delayed wound healing. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an established technique for the management of wound complications and is also being used nowadays for early healing of uncomplicated postoperative wounds. Materials and Methods: We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness of NPWT over conventional dressing methods by creating two groups of patients with tibial plateau fractures managed by plating. Postoperatively, NPWT was applied to one group and the other group was followed up with routine conventional dressings. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the study, and it was found that the rate of minor and major wound site complications was more in the group of patients managed by conventional dressing. Conclusion: With our study, we concluded that in high-velocity proximal tibia fractures with a lot of soft-tissue traumas, incisional NPWT is well tolerated and has shown a definitive advantage in preventing wound-related complications as compared to regular conventional dressing.
双钢板治疗胫骨近端骨折术后切口负压创面与常规敷料的比较评价
背景:手术治疗的胫骨平台高速损伤常并发手术部位感染和伤口愈合延迟。切口负压创面治疗(NPWT)是一种治疗创面并发症的成熟技术,目前也被用于无并发症的术后创面的早期愈合。材料和方法:我们进行了这项研究,通过创建两组钢板治疗胫骨平台骨折的患者来比较NPWT与传统敷料方法的有效性。术后一组应用NPWT,另一组采用常规常规敷料随访。结果:本研究共纳入88例患者,发现常规敷料组小、重度创面并发症发生率均高于常规敷料组。结论:通过我们的研究,我们得出结论,在高速胫骨近端骨折伴大量软组织损伤的情况下,与常规常规敷料相比,切口NPWT耐受性良好,在预防伤口相关并发症方面具有明确的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信