Editor’s Note: Another Glorious Company

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 ART
John Cunnally
{"title":"Editor’s Note: Another Glorious Company","authors":"John Cunnally","doi":"10.1086/725524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Sigmund Freud was asked if he was familiar with the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, he replied that he had heard of Nietzsche but deliberately avoided reading his books. He suspected that the philosopher’s ideas might be too similar to his own and could thus inhibit or deflect his process of discovery. This anecdote comes to mind whenever one of my university students (or a writer submitting an article to our journal) is criticized for missing some important, even vital, authority among the scholarly sources cited in their research paper. The author sometimes justifies this omission by insisting that their discovery is so","PeriodicalId":43235,"journal":{"name":"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Sigmund Freud was asked if he was familiar with the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, he replied that he had heard of Nietzsche but deliberately avoided reading his books. He suspected that the philosopher’s ideas might be too similar to his own and could thus inhibit or deflect his process of discovery. This anecdote comes to mind whenever one of my university students (or a writer submitting an article to our journal) is criticized for missing some important, even vital, authority among the scholarly sources cited in their research paper. The author sometimes justifies this omission by insisting that their discovery is so
编者按:又一家光荣的公司
当西格蒙德·弗洛伊德被问及是否熟悉弗里德里希·尼采的著作时,他回答说他听说过尼采,但故意不读他的书。他怀疑这位哲学家的观点可能与他自己的过于相似,从而可能阻碍或偏离他的发现过程。每当我的一个大学生(或向我们期刊投稿的作者)因为在他们的研究论文中引用的学术资料中遗漏了一些重要的,甚至是至关重要的权威而受到批评时,这个轶事就会浮现在我的脑海中。作者有时坚称他们的发现是如此,以此来为这种遗漏辩护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信