To Leave or Not to Leave, That Is the Question: Discussing Notions of Particularity in “Breaking the Cycle” through the Lens of Feminist Literary Theory

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Reem Atiyat, I. A. Momani
{"title":"To Leave or Not to Leave, That Is the Question: Discussing Notions of Particularity in “Breaking the Cycle” through the Lens of Feminist Literary Theory","authors":"Reem Atiyat, I. A. Momani","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.24.3.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article presents a comparative investigation of intimate partner violence centering on the analysis of Breaking the Cycle (Zane 2005). The article addresses incest as both a pattern of intimate partner violence and a factor that influences the abused character’s decision to desert her perpetrator, putting an end to a seemingly endless cycle of violence. In this respect, incest is examined as one among other resistance factors that stress the necessity for the victim to take counteraction to end the cycle of violence within an intimate relationship once the safety of the abused woman’s children is at stake. The literary works discussed constitute the raw material for examination since they highlight different patterns of intimate partner violence against women and the factors that impact a woman’s decision to leave an abusive intimate relationship. The analytical approach adopted is that of qualitative content analysis. A central concern in this article is to voice the victim’s struggle and efforts to escape her violent marriage from a feminist perspective, highlighting the particularity of her experience rather than its generalizability, which has not been addressed in the available research on literary domestic violence studies to date.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"409 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.3.0409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article presents a comparative investigation of intimate partner violence centering on the analysis of Breaking the Cycle (Zane 2005). The article addresses incest as both a pattern of intimate partner violence and a factor that influences the abused character’s decision to desert her perpetrator, putting an end to a seemingly endless cycle of violence. In this respect, incest is examined as one among other resistance factors that stress the necessity for the victim to take counteraction to end the cycle of violence within an intimate relationship once the safety of the abused woman’s children is at stake. The literary works discussed constitute the raw material for examination since they highlight different patterns of intimate partner violence against women and the factors that impact a woman’s decision to leave an abusive intimate relationship. The analytical approach adopted is that of qualitative content analysis. A central concern in this article is to voice the victim’s struggle and efforts to escape her violent marriage from a feminist perspective, highlighting the particularity of her experience rather than its generalizability, which has not been addressed in the available research on literary domestic violence studies to date.
离开还是不离开,这是一个问题:从女性主义文论的视角探讨《打破循环》中的特殊性概念
本文以《打破循环》(Zane 2005)为中心,对亲密伴侣暴力进行了比较研究。文章认为,乱伦既是亲密伴侣暴力的一种模式,也是影响被虐待者决定抛弃施暴者的一个因素,从而结束了看似无穷无尽的暴力循环。在这方面,将乱伦作为其他阻力因素之一加以审查,这些因素强调,一旦受虐待妇女的子女的安全受到威胁,受害者就必须采取反击措施,以结束亲密关系中的暴力循环。所讨论的文学作品构成了审查的原始材料,因为它们突出了亲密伴侣对妇女的暴力行为的不同模式以及影响妇女决定离开虐待亲密关系的因素。所采用的分析方法是定性内容分析。本文的中心关注点是从女权主义的角度来表达受害者为逃离暴力婚姻所做的斗争和努力,强调她的经历的特殊性,而不是其概括性,这在迄今为止的文学家庭暴力研究中尚未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信