Optimality analysis of train platforming and routing with different interlocking modes

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Yuan Wang, Xiaopeng Li
{"title":"Optimality analysis of train platforming and routing with different interlocking modes","authors":"Yuan Wang,&nbsp;Xiaopeng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The train platforming and routing (TPR) problem is to decide train operations within stations after the network-wise train schedules are determined. A feasible TPR plan requires both platform and route conflict-free, where the avoidance of route conflict is controlled according to three interlocking modes. Although the TPR problem is widely studied, none of them did a serious investigation on the optimality impacts of different interlocking modes in the TPR. Therefore, this paper introduced and formulated a space–time version of TPR considering three interlocking modes and subsequentially conducted numerical experiments to analyze the optimality differences under each mode. Based on the experimental findings, engineering practical suggestions are also provided. In summary, the experiment results showed that both route-locking sectional-release and sectional-locking sectional-release modes significantly outperform the route-locking route-release mode. And among them, using the route-locking sectional-release mode can bring notable benefits on large stations with high-density volumes while using the sectional-locking sectional-release mode can always provide outstanding outcomes over various station and traffic settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424722000117/pdfft?md5=b66fb68db92dac3fea915205d79de196&pid=1-s2.0-S2772424722000117-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424722000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The train platforming and routing (TPR) problem is to decide train operations within stations after the network-wise train schedules are determined. A feasible TPR plan requires both platform and route conflict-free, where the avoidance of route conflict is controlled according to three interlocking modes. Although the TPR problem is widely studied, none of them did a serious investigation on the optimality impacts of different interlocking modes in the TPR. Therefore, this paper introduced and formulated a space–time version of TPR considering three interlocking modes and subsequentially conducted numerical experiments to analyze the optimality differences under each mode. Based on the experimental findings, engineering practical suggestions are also provided. In summary, the experiment results showed that both route-locking sectional-release and sectional-locking sectional-release modes significantly outperform the route-locking route-release mode. And among them, using the route-locking sectional-release mode can bring notable benefits on large stations with high-density volumes while using the sectional-locking sectional-release mode can always provide outstanding outcomes over various station and traffic settings.

不同联锁方式下列车站台与路线优化分析
列车站台与路线规划(TPR)问题是在路网列车时刻表确定后,决定车站内的列车运行。可行的TPR方案要求平台无冲突,路径无冲突,其中路径冲突的避免通过三种联锁方式进行控制。尽管对TPR问题的研究非常广泛,但没有人对TPR中不同联锁模式的最优性影响进行过认真的研究。因此,本文引入并制定了考虑三种互锁模式的时空版TPR,并进行了数值实验,分析了每种模式下的最优性差异。根据试验结果,提出了工程实用建议。综上所述,实验结果表明,路由锁定的路段释放和路段锁定的路段释放模式都明显优于路由锁定的路段释放模式。其中,采用路线锁定分段释放模式对大容量高密度站点的效益显著,而采用路段锁定分段释放模式在各种站点和流量设置下均能取得较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信