Fat food justice: where fat studies meets food studies

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
J. Brady, Leigh Potvin, A. Bombak, Andrea Kirkham, K. Fraser, J. Gingras
{"title":"Fat food justice: where fat studies meets food studies","authors":"J. Brady, Leigh Potvin, A. Bombak, Andrea Kirkham, K. Fraser, J. Gingras","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2021.1968667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This special issue emerged from a sense of disconnection experienced by the members of the guest co-editorial team who seek to advance food justice as food studies scholars on one hand and fat liberation as fat studies scholars on the other. We assert that, despite their similarities and shared commitments to social and structural justice, there has been little cross-pollination between the fat studies and food studies communities. Fat studies scholars have rightly called out the fat hatred that has been promulgated by food studies scholars and activists, but fat studies scholars have yet to bring their incisive analyses to bear on areas of import to food studies, such as political economy of food, food systems, and food policy. This has left a significant gap in the fat studies literature, as well as an unexplored connection point for fat studies scholars with food studies and the movement for food systems change. Drawing on conceptualizations of food sovereignty in the food studies literature, and fat studies scholars’ analyses of healthism and medicalization, we elaborate health sovereignty as a conceptual spark that may lead to future collaborative scholarship and activism among the heretofore uneasy relationship among the food studies and fat studies communities.","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"GE-21 2","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1968667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This special issue emerged from a sense of disconnection experienced by the members of the guest co-editorial team who seek to advance food justice as food studies scholars on one hand and fat liberation as fat studies scholars on the other. We assert that, despite their similarities and shared commitments to social and structural justice, there has been little cross-pollination between the fat studies and food studies communities. Fat studies scholars have rightly called out the fat hatred that has been promulgated by food studies scholars and activists, but fat studies scholars have yet to bring their incisive analyses to bear on areas of import to food studies, such as political economy of food, food systems, and food policy. This has left a significant gap in the fat studies literature, as well as an unexplored connection point for fat studies scholars with food studies and the movement for food systems change. Drawing on conceptualizations of food sovereignty in the food studies literature, and fat studies scholars’ analyses of healthism and medicalization, we elaborate health sovereignty as a conceptual spark that may lead to future collaborative scholarship and activism among the heretofore uneasy relationship among the food studies and fat studies communities.
脂肪食物公正:脂肪研究与食物研究的结合
本期特刊源于本期客座共同编辑团队成员的一种脱节感,他们一方面作为食品研究学者寻求促进食品正义,另一方面作为脂肪研究学者寻求脂肪解放。我们认为,尽管脂肪研究和食物研究之间存在着相似性和对社会和结构正义的共同承诺,但它们之间几乎没有交叉授粉。脂肪研究学者正确地指出了食品研究学者和活动家所宣扬的脂肪仇恨,但脂肪研究学者尚未将他们的深刻分析带到食品研究的重要领域,如食品的政治经济学、食品系统和食品政策。这在脂肪研究文献中留下了一个重要的空白,也为脂肪研究学者与食物研究和食物系统变化运动留下了一个未被探索的连接点。借鉴食品研究文献中的食品主权概念,以及脂肪研究学者对健康主义和医疗化的分析,我们将健康主权阐述为一种概念火花,可能会在食品研究和脂肪研究社区之间迄今为止不稳定的关系中导致未来的合作学术和行动主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信