Perception of individual and group discrimination among LGB individuals in Puerto Rico: A descriptive study

Caleb Esteban, J. González-Rivera
{"title":"Perception of individual and group discrimination among LGB individuals in Puerto Rico: A descriptive study","authors":"Caleb Esteban, J. González-Rivera","doi":"10.24016/2022.v8.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Discrimination is one or more unjustified negative behaviors towards a person based on one or more characteristics of that person. In the case of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons, they have been constant victims of stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination around the world. However, few scientific studies explore the experiences of discrimination in Puerto Rico, since most studies have focused on negative attitudes, prejudice, and social distance. Objective: The aims of this brief report are 1) to describe in detail the relative importance of the quality of the items of the Perceived Discrimination in the LGB Community Scale, and 2) to describe the experiences of discrimination both at the individual and group level of an LGB sample according to the order of relative importance found. Method: This research had a quantitative method with a descriptive study design, instrumental type. To meet the objective of this study, the data collected in each item was independently evaluated to examine the experience and perception of each participant in the situation presented by each premise. A non-probability sample of 300 LGB participants was recruited in Puerto Rico. Results: The area with the highest reported experiences of individual discrimination was the relationship category (M=.700), followed by psychological (M=.630), society/environmental (M=.566), family/employment (M=.566) and physical (M=.386) respectively. The area with the highest perceptions of group discrimination reported by the sample was the education/health category (M = .882), followed by culture/society (M=.827), politics (M=.803), maternity/paternity (M=.802) and locality (M=.791) respectively. Conclusion: When analyzing all the items, it was observed that the results of the first 22 positions according to the Relative Importance Index, correspond to the experiences of discrimination in a group way. This means that people perceive greater discrimination as a group than the discrimination they perceive about their own person.","PeriodicalId":53161,"journal":{"name":"Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicologia","volume":"59 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24016/2022.v8.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discrimination is one or more unjustified negative behaviors towards a person based on one or more characteristics of that person. In the case of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons, they have been constant victims of stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination around the world. However, few scientific studies explore the experiences of discrimination in Puerto Rico, since most studies have focused on negative attitudes, prejudice, and social distance. Objective: The aims of this brief report are 1) to describe in detail the relative importance of the quality of the items of the Perceived Discrimination in the LGB Community Scale, and 2) to describe the experiences of discrimination both at the individual and group level of an LGB sample according to the order of relative importance found. Method: This research had a quantitative method with a descriptive study design, instrumental type. To meet the objective of this study, the data collected in each item was independently evaluated to examine the experience and perception of each participant in the situation presented by each premise. A non-probability sample of 300 LGB participants was recruited in Puerto Rico. Results: The area with the highest reported experiences of individual discrimination was the relationship category (M=.700), followed by psychological (M=.630), society/environmental (M=.566), family/employment (M=.566) and physical (M=.386) respectively. The area with the highest perceptions of group discrimination reported by the sample was the education/health category (M = .882), followed by culture/society (M=.827), politics (M=.803), maternity/paternity (M=.802) and locality (M=.791) respectively. Conclusion: When analyzing all the items, it was observed that the results of the first 22 positions according to the Relative Importance Index, correspond to the experiences of discrimination in a group way. This means that people perceive greater discrimination as a group than the discrimination they perceive about their own person.
波多黎各LGB个体对个体和群体歧视的感知:一项描述性研究
背景:歧视是基于某人的一个或多个特征而对该人做出的一种或多种不合理的负面行为。就女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)而言,他们一直是世界各地刻板印象、偏见和歧视的受害者。然而,很少有科学研究探讨波多黎各的歧视经历,因为大多数研究都集中在消极态度、偏见和社会距离上。目的:本简短报告的目的是1)详细描述LGB社区量表中感知歧视项目质量的相对重要性,以及2)根据相对重要性的顺序描述LGB样本在个人和群体层面上的歧视经历。方法:本研究采用定量方法,采用描述性研究设计,工具型。为了达到本研究的目的,在每个项目中收集的数据被独立评估,以检查每个参与者在每个前提所呈现的情况下的经验和感知。在波多黎各招募了300名LGB参与者的非概率样本。结果:报告中个体歧视经历最多的领域是关系领域(M= 0.700),其次是心理领域(M= 0.630)、社会/环境领域(M= 0.566)、家庭/就业领域(M= 0.566)和身体领域(M= 0.386)。样本报告的群体歧视感知最高的领域是教育/健康类别(M=. 882),其次是文化/社会(M=.827)、政治(M=.803)、母系/父系(M=.802)和地方(M=.791)。结论:在对所有项目进行分析时,根据相对重要性指数,前22个职位的结果与群体歧视的经历相对应。这意味着人们认为作为一个群体的歧视比他们对自己的歧视更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信