Estructura factorial de la Escala de Balance Afectivo en población normativa

IF 2.3 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinica Y Salud Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clysa.2015.03.001

Pedro J. Amor , Francisco Pablo Holgado-Tello, Amaia Lasa-Aristu, Francisco Javier Domínguez-Sánchez, Begoña Delgado

{"title":"Estructura factorial de la Escala de Balance Afectivo en población normativa","authors":"Pedro J. Amor , Francisco Pablo Holgado-Tello, Amaia Lasa-Aristu, Francisco Javier Domínguez-Sánchez, Begoña Delgado","doi":"10.1016/j.clysa.2015.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyses the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Affective Balance Scale by comparing two versions, the original by <span>Warr, Barter, and Brownbridge (1983)</span> and the proposed by <span>Godoy-Izquierdo, Martínez, and Godoy (2008)</span>, and examines the effect of some items’ wording on the possible outcome. Six-hundred people between the ages of 18 and 58 from the normative population participated in the study. Even though the two versions of the scale present an acceptable and similar goodness of fit index (GFI), the proposed version demonstrated greater reliability and better mean discrimination. The research also found a good adjustment for the second order factor structure (affective balance) with two first order factors (negative and positive affect). Even though the findings only indicated an effect on the items with a positive affect dimension, it is our recommendation that users of the scale adopt the proposed version and refrain from using ‘very’ as item qualifier.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2015.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130527415000122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study analyses the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Affective Balance Scale by comparing two versions, the original by Warr, Barter, and Brownbridge (1983) and the proposed by Godoy-Izquierdo, Martínez, and Godoy (2008), and examines the effect of some items’ wording on the possible outcome. Six-hundred people between the ages of 18 and 58 from the normative population participated in the study. Even though the two versions of the scale present an acceptable and similar goodness of fit index (GFI), the proposed version demonstrated greater reliability and better mean discrimination. The research also found a good adjustment for the second order factor structure (affective balance) with two first order factors (negative and positive affect). Even though the findings only indicated an effect on the items with a positive affect dimension, it is our recommendation that users of the scale adopt the proposed version and refrain from using ‘very’ as item qualifier.

查看原文本刊更多论文

规范人群情感平衡量表的因子结构

本研究通过比较Warr、Barter和Brownbridge（1983）的原始版本和Godoy Izquierdo、Martínez和Godoi（2008）提出的两个版本，分析了情感平衡量表的维度和心理测量特性，并考察了一些项目的措辞对可能结果的影响。规范人群中有600名年龄在18岁至58岁之间的人参与了这项研究。尽管两个版本的量表呈现出可接受且相似的拟合优度指数（GFI），但所提出的版本显示出更高的可靠性和更好的平均值判别能力。研究还发现，二阶因素结构（情感平衡）与两个一阶因素（消极和积极情感）有很好的调节作用。尽管调查结果只表明对具有积极影响维度的项目有影响，但我们建议该量表的用户采用拟议版本，不要使用“非常”作为项目限定词。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

7.40%

发文量

审稿时长

26 weeks