State-of-the-art challenges for mental health services research

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Susan M. Essock
{"title":"State-of-the-art challenges for mental health services research","authors":"Susan M. Essock","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199903)2:1<9::AID-MHP32>3.0.CO;2-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research-based, state-of-the-art services for people with serious mental disorders would consist of demonstrably effective treatments, organized synergistically, and financed in ways that create incentives to provide such treatment. While research exists in these domains of treatment, organization and financing, this research base contains significant gaps, and what is known frequently neither informs policy making nor enters practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Review</h3>\n \n <p>The NIMH services-research portfolio has identified successful patient-level and system-level interventions for people with serious mental disorders, but much of this research has yet to make its way into practice. Similarly, while we have made progress in asking ‘what is good care?’, we have much less information about the answers to ‘what constitutes an adequate try?’. Writing a prescription for an efficacious medication does not constitute an adequate trial of that medication. Similarly, offering people boring psychosocial rehabilitation programs does not constitute an adequate try of promoting recovery via rehabilitation services, but what does? Defining what constitutes an adequate try can be a way of allocating scarce resources or it can be a polite way of defining when a system gets to give up on someone. As state governments move to contract with managed care entities for services for Medicaid beneficiaries, one of the great contracting challenges is defining and monitoring the provision of what constitutes an adequate try.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>To obtain better value for our health care expenditures, we need to find ways to get what we know works into practice, whether we are contracting for services or deciding which clinical therapies to pursue. For example, problem-oriented family therapy has been shown to improve clinical outcomes for people with schizophrenia, yet such interventions are rare in practice. We also need to pay more attention to the quality of the clinical care actually being delivered—not what was prescribed, nor what the clinician was trained in, nor what the job description was, but what actually is occurring. Figuring out how to contract for and disseminate efficacious treatments so that they occur and are effective in real-world settings is critically important yet is a largely unexplored area of services research. We need to answer both ‘what is good care?’ and ‘how do we get it to happen?’. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"2 1","pages":"9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199903)2:1<9::AID-MHP32>3.0.CO;2-S","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-176X%28199903%292%3A1%3C9%3A%3AAID-MHP32%3E3.0.CO%3B2-S","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Research-based, state-of-the-art services for people with serious mental disorders would consist of demonstrably effective treatments, organized synergistically, and financed in ways that create incentives to provide such treatment. While research exists in these domains of treatment, organization and financing, this research base contains significant gaps, and what is known frequently neither informs policy making nor enters practice.

Review

The NIMH services-research portfolio has identified successful patient-level and system-level interventions for people with serious mental disorders, but much of this research has yet to make its way into practice. Similarly, while we have made progress in asking ‘what is good care?’, we have much less information about the answers to ‘what constitutes an adequate try?’. Writing a prescription for an efficacious medication does not constitute an adequate trial of that medication. Similarly, offering people boring psychosocial rehabilitation programs does not constitute an adequate try of promoting recovery via rehabilitation services, but what does? Defining what constitutes an adequate try can be a way of allocating scarce resources or it can be a polite way of defining when a system gets to give up on someone. As state governments move to contract with managed care entities for services for Medicaid beneficiaries, one of the great contracting challenges is defining and monitoring the provision of what constitutes an adequate try.

Discussion

To obtain better value for our health care expenditures, we need to find ways to get what we know works into practice, whether we are contracting for services or deciding which clinical therapies to pursue. For example, problem-oriented family therapy has been shown to improve clinical outcomes for people with schizophrenia, yet such interventions are rare in practice. We also need to pay more attention to the quality of the clinical care actually being delivered—not what was prescribed, nor what the clinician was trained in, nor what the job description was, but what actually is occurring. Figuring out how to contract for and disseminate efficacious treatments so that they occur and are effective in real-world settings is critically important yet is a largely unexplored area of services research. We need to answer both ‘what is good care?’ and ‘how do we get it to happen?’. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

心理健康服务研究面临的最新挑战
背景为严重精神障碍患者提供基于研究的最先进服务将包括明显有效的治疗,协同组织,并以激励提供此类治疗的方式提供资金。虽然在治疗、组织和融资等领域都有研究,但这一研究基础存在重大差距,而且众所周知的情况往往既没有为政策制定提供信息,也没有进入实践。综述NIMH服务研究组合已经为患有严重精神障碍的人确定了成功的患者级和系统级干预措施,但这项研究的大部分尚未付诸实践。同样,尽管我们在询问“什么是好的护理?”方面取得了进展,关于“什么是充分尝试?”的答案,我们的信息要少得多。开具有效药物的处方并不构成对该药物的充分试验。同样,为人们提供无聊的心理社会康复计划并不能充分尝试通过康复服务促进康复,但什么是呢?定义什么是充分尝试可以是分配稀缺资源的一种方式,也可以是定义系统何时放弃某人的一种礼貌方式。随着各州政府开始与管理型护理实体签订合同,为医疗补助受益人提供服务,签订合同的最大挑战之一是定义和监督什么是充分尝试。讨论为了使我们的医疗保健支出获得更好的价值,我们需要找到方法,将我们所知道的有效方法付诸实践,无论我们是签订服务合同还是决定采用哪种临床疗法。例如,以问题为导向的家庭治疗已被证明可以改善精神分裂症患者的临床结果,但这种干预措施在实践中很少见。我们还需要更多地关注实际提供的临床护理的质量——不是处方,也不是临床医生接受过什么培训,也不是工作描述,而是实际发生了什么。弄清楚如何签约和传播有效的治疗方法,使其在现实世界中发生并有效,这一点至关重要,但这在很大程度上是一个尚未探索的服务研究领域。我们需要回答“什么是好的护理?”以及“我们如何实现这一目标?”。版权所有©1999 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信