A mereological qualitative study protocol for understanding the lived experience of homelessness in California

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Michael Duke PhD, Zena K. Dhatt BS, Tianna Jacques BA, Cheyenne Garcia BA, Grace Taylor BA, Margot Kushel MD, Kelly Knight PhD
{"title":"A mereological qualitative study protocol for understanding the lived experience of homelessness in California","authors":"Michael Duke PhD,&nbsp;Zena K. Dhatt BS,&nbsp;Tianna Jacques BA,&nbsp;Cheyenne Garcia BA,&nbsp;Grace Taylor BA,&nbsp;Margot Kushel MD,&nbsp;Kelly Knight PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.12207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although qualitative interview studies provide in-depth understandings of the opinions and lived experiences of social groups, they are typically small in scale, bounded by a small number of physical or virtual spaces, and designed to capture relatively demarcated aspects of participants’ experiences. This paper describes the qualitative component of a large mixed method study of homelessness in California. The qualitative study consisted of seven substudies across eight counties, each exploring different dimensions of homelessness. We recruited participants from the overall sample, a statewide representative sample of adults experiencing homelessness recruited in eight counties, based on their responses to questions from the survey interviews. Using a novel data management strategy, we analyzed each substudy as a stand-alone project, and explored the relationship between thematic content across the substudies. Our mereological study design presents an approach for developing complex qualitative policy studies across a range of topic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although qualitative interview studies provide in-depth understandings of the opinions and lived experiences of social groups, they are typically small in scale, bounded by a small number of physical or virtual spaces, and designed to capture relatively demarcated aspects of participants’ experiences. This paper describes the qualitative component of a large mixed method study of homelessness in California. The qualitative study consisted of seven substudies across eight counties, each exploring different dimensions of homelessness. We recruited participants from the overall sample, a statewide representative sample of adults experiencing homelessness recruited in eight counties, based on their responses to questions from the survey interviews. Using a novel data management strategy, we analyzed each substudy as a stand-alone project, and explored the relationship between thematic content across the substudies. Our mereological study design presents an approach for developing complex qualitative policy studies across a range of topic areas.

Abstract Image

理解加州无家可归者生活经历的表面论定性研究方案
尽管定性访谈研究提供了对社会群体意见和生活经历的深入理解,但它们通常规模较小,受少量物理或虚拟空间的限制,旨在捕捉参与者经历的相对界限化的方面。本文描述了一项针对加州无家可归者的大型混合方法研究的定性组成部分。这项定性研究由八个县的七个子研究组成,每个研究都探讨了无家可归的不同层面。我们从总体样本中招募了参与者,这是一个在八个县招募的无家可归成年人的全州代表性样本,基于他们对调查采访问题的回答。使用一种新颖的数据管理策略,我们将每个子研究作为一个独立的项目进行分析,并探索子研究中主题内容之间的关系。我们的表面研究设计提供了一种在一系列主题领域开展复杂的定性政策研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信