Establishment and application of ecological health evaluation system for urban and rural rivers in Yangtze Estuary

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Biaobiao Peng, Benwei Shi, Ya Ping Wang, Jingjing Li, Xinmiao Zhang, Xiaoyu Liu, Lei Mo, Anglu Shen, Yifan Ding
{"title":"Establishment and application of ecological health evaluation system for urban and rural rivers in Yangtze Estuary","authors":"Biaobiao Peng,&nbsp;Benwei Shi,&nbsp;Ya Ping Wang,&nbsp;Jingjing Li,&nbsp;Xinmiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Liu,&nbsp;Lei Mo,&nbsp;Anglu Shen,&nbsp;Yifan Ding","doi":"10.1007/s44218-023-00024-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The assessment of river ecosystem health is crucial for improving river resilience, achieving ecological protection and rational utilization in the Yangtze Estuary region where there is high utilization of rivers and a high demand for quality rivers by Shanghai, the world's largest modern city. To assess the ecological health status of Yangtze Estuary rivers, this study established a river health assessment model consisting of five dimensions: water quality, river landscape, aquatic organisms, river hydrology, and human interference, and a total of ten indicators based on the ecological survey results in the summer and autumn of six river channels in Chongming Island in the Yangtze Estuary. The evaluation results reveal that the health status of rural rivers in the northwest and east of Chongming Island (S2, S3) is the best, reaching an excellent level, while the small river in the central part of Chongming Island (S6) is the worst, reaching a somewhat inferior level. Compared with rural rivers, the comprehensive evaluation results of urban rivers are good or ordinary level. The high proportion of building area on both sides of the river and the low vegetation cover are the main factors that restrict their scoring results. In contrast, rural rivers need to focus on the area of buffer zones such as forests and vegetation on both sides of the river, river connectivity, appropriate widening of narrow rivers, regular cleaning and dredging of rivers, as well as reducing human interference with the rivers. Regarding seasonal changes, the health assessment results of Chongming Island rivers in summer are better than those in autumn, and the differences between sites in summer are slightly greater than those in autumn. The seasonal differences between sites are mainly due to changes in indicators of the diversity of zooplankton, phytoplankton, and macrobenthos. To further improve the ecological health of rivers, measures of ecological restoration could be adjusted based on regular health assessment and health weakness analysis.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-023-00024-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of river ecosystem health is crucial for improving river resilience, achieving ecological protection and rational utilization in the Yangtze Estuary region where there is high utilization of rivers and a high demand for quality rivers by Shanghai, the world's largest modern city. To assess the ecological health status of Yangtze Estuary rivers, this study established a river health assessment model consisting of five dimensions: water quality, river landscape, aquatic organisms, river hydrology, and human interference, and a total of ten indicators based on the ecological survey results in the summer and autumn of six river channels in Chongming Island in the Yangtze Estuary. The evaluation results reveal that the health status of rural rivers in the northwest and east of Chongming Island (S2, S3) is the best, reaching an excellent level, while the small river in the central part of Chongming Island (S6) is the worst, reaching a somewhat inferior level. Compared with rural rivers, the comprehensive evaluation results of urban rivers are good or ordinary level. The high proportion of building area on both sides of the river and the low vegetation cover are the main factors that restrict their scoring results. In contrast, rural rivers need to focus on the area of buffer zones such as forests and vegetation on both sides of the river, river connectivity, appropriate widening of narrow rivers, regular cleaning and dredging of rivers, as well as reducing human interference with the rivers. Regarding seasonal changes, the health assessment results of Chongming Island rivers in summer are better than those in autumn, and the differences between sites in summer are slightly greater than those in autumn. The seasonal differences between sites are mainly due to changes in indicators of the diversity of zooplankton, phytoplankton, and macrobenthos. To further improve the ecological health of rivers, measures of ecological restoration could be adjusted based on regular health assessment and health weakness analysis.

长江口城乡河流生态健康评价体系的建立与应用
河流生态系统健康评估对于提高河流抵御能力、实现长江口地区的生态保护和合理利用至关重要。长江口地区是世界最大的现代化城市上海对河流利用率高、对优质河流需求高的地区。为了评估长江口河流的生态健康状况,本研究建立了一个由水质、河流景观、水生生物、河流水文和人为干扰五个维度组成的河流健康评估模型,根据长江口崇明岛6条河道夏秋两季生态调查结果,共提出10项指标。评价结果表明,崇明岛西北部和东部的农村河流(S2、S3)健康状况最好,达到优良水平,而崇明岛中部的小河(S6)健康状况最差,达到较差水平。与农村河流相比,城市河流综合评价结果较好或一般。河流两岸建筑面积比例高、植被覆盖率低是制约其评分结果的主要因素。相比之下,农村河流需要关注缓冲区的面积,如河流两侧的森林和植被、河流连通性、适当拓宽狭窄的河流、定期清理和疏浚河流,以及减少人类对河流的干扰。就季节变化而言,崇明岛河流夏季健康评估结果好于秋季,夏季站点之间的差异略大于秋季。地点之间的季节差异主要是由于浮游动物、浮游植物和大型底栖动物多样性指标的变化。为了进一步改善河流的生态健康,可以在定期健康评估和健康薄弱环节分析的基础上调整生态修复措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信