Misjudging drinking water quality risk: Adopting a barrier approach for meaningful risk assessment to address latent risks.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Richard Walker
{"title":"Misjudging drinking water quality risk: Adopting a barrier approach for meaningful risk assessment to address latent risks.","authors":"Richard Walker","doi":"10.2166/wh.2023.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The water quality risk assessment is the foundation for every drinking Water Safety Plan. The need to conform with a 'Corporate' risk assessment model commonly dominated by asset management frequency data can cause misjudgement of microbial risk. Well-performed risk assessments should identify potential risks. Risk assessments which place too much emphasis on historical evidence to demonstrate 'likelihood' of microbial contamination are unsuitable for drinking water quality because they fail to recognise 'latent' risks associated with absent or underperforming barriers to contamination. Most outbreaks occur when these 'latent' factors align to create a failure. Good risk assessments need to provide foresight. This is achieved if drinking water quality risk assessments are based on a 'barrier' approach. Where adequate and reliable multiple barriers to contamination are present the likelihood of a hazardous event should then be categorised as rare. Where barriers are absent, inadequate, or unreliable, then a higher likelihood is appropriate, depending on the nature and extent of the barrier shortfall. Practical examples show how the 'barrier' approach can be applied. The barrier risk assessment directly informs the operational monitoring programme, enabling regular confirmation that the challenge and barrier performance are consistent with the predictions of the risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water and health","volume":"21 10","pages":"1404-1420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/wh_2023_077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water and health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2023.077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The water quality risk assessment is the foundation for every drinking Water Safety Plan. The need to conform with a 'Corporate' risk assessment model commonly dominated by asset management frequency data can cause misjudgement of microbial risk. Well-performed risk assessments should identify potential risks. Risk assessments which place too much emphasis on historical evidence to demonstrate 'likelihood' of microbial contamination are unsuitable for drinking water quality because they fail to recognise 'latent' risks associated with absent or underperforming barriers to contamination. Most outbreaks occur when these 'latent' factors align to create a failure. Good risk assessments need to provide foresight. This is achieved if drinking water quality risk assessments are based on a 'barrier' approach. Where adequate and reliable multiple barriers to contamination are present the likelihood of a hazardous event should then be categorised as rare. Where barriers are absent, inadequate, or unreliable, then a higher likelihood is appropriate, depending on the nature and extent of the barrier shortfall. Practical examples show how the 'barrier' approach can be applied. The barrier risk assessment directly informs the operational monitoring programme, enabling regular confirmation that the challenge and barrier performance are consistent with the predictions of the risk assessment.

误判饮用水质量风险:采用屏障方法进行有意义的风险评估,以解决潜在风险。
水质风险评估是每个饮用水安全计划的基础。需要符合通常由资产管理频率数据主导的“企业”风险评估模型可能会导致对微生物风险的误判。执行良好的风险评估应识别潜在风险。过于强调历史证据来证明微生物污染“可能性”的风险评估不适合饮用水质量,因为它们没有认识到与缺乏或表现不佳的污染屏障相关的“潜在”风险。当这些“潜在”因素结合起来造成失败时,大多数疫情都会发生。良好的风险评估需要提供前瞻性。如果饮用水质量风险评估基于“屏障”方法,则可以实现这一点。如果存在足够且可靠的多重污染屏障,则应将发生危险事件的可能性归类为罕见。如果障碍物不存在、不充分或不可靠,则根据障碍物短缺的性质和程度,采用更高的可能性是合适的。实例说明了如何应用“障碍”方法。屏障风险评估直接告知运营监测计划,从而能够定期确认挑战和屏障性能与风险评估的预测一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of water and health
Journal of water and health 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Health is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of information on the health implications and control of waterborne microorganisms and chemical substances in the broadest sense for developing and developed countries worldwide. This is to include microbial toxins, chemical quality and the aesthetic qualities of water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信