Development of oral oncolytic nonadherence estimator (ORACLE): A pretreatment nonadherence risk assessment for oral oncolytics.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/10781552231208442
Jessie Signorelli, Thuy Tran, Marie E Sirek, Yarelis Díaz-Rohena, Jodi L Taraba, Benyam Muluneh, Nayanika Basu, Jennifer Lilly, Julianne Darling
{"title":"Development of oral oncolytic nonadherence estimator (ORACLE): A pretreatment nonadherence risk assessment for oral oncolytics.","authors":"Jessie Signorelli, Thuy Tran, Marie E Sirek, Yarelis Díaz-Rohena, Jodi L Taraba, Benyam Muluneh, Nayanika Basu, Jennifer Lilly, Julianne Darling","doi":"10.1177/10781552231208442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To date, there is no adherence estimator to identify risk of nonadherence prior to initiating oral oncolytics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A workgroup was assembled through the National Community Oncology Dispensing Association and tasked with creating a tool to meet this need. Tool constructs were defined after a review of the literature identifying top barriers to adherence. A second literature search was conducted to identify questions targeting specific barriers from validated adherence questionnaires. Once a finalized draft was complete, the risk assessment tool was built into an electronic survey where a risk category can be automatically calculated for the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The six most impactful factors affecting compliance to oral oncolytics were identified as patient's confidence, health literacy, perception of treatment, quality of life, social support, and complexity of chemotherapy regimen. A six-item questionnaire was created with five patient-directed questions and one clinician-directed question. Examples and descriptions were provided for clinicians to consider when categorizing complexity of a regimen. The tool was designed for responses to each question to be indexed into categories through a 10-point system. Results will be stratified into low, moderate, or high risk for nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The creation of a tool to predict nonadherence prior to starting therapy is an unmet need for patients initiating oral oncolytics. The aim of this tool is to meet those needs and better guide clinicians to provide patients with strategies to better manage nonadherence. Next steps include tool validation and piloting in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1307-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231208442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To date, there is no adherence estimator to identify risk of nonadherence prior to initiating oral oncolytics.

Methods: A workgroup was assembled through the National Community Oncology Dispensing Association and tasked with creating a tool to meet this need. Tool constructs were defined after a review of the literature identifying top barriers to adherence. A second literature search was conducted to identify questions targeting specific barriers from validated adherence questionnaires. Once a finalized draft was complete, the risk assessment tool was built into an electronic survey where a risk category can be automatically calculated for the patient.

Results: The six most impactful factors affecting compliance to oral oncolytics were identified as patient's confidence, health literacy, perception of treatment, quality of life, social support, and complexity of chemotherapy regimen. A six-item questionnaire was created with five patient-directed questions and one clinician-directed question. Examples and descriptions were provided for clinicians to consider when categorizing complexity of a regimen. The tool was designed for responses to each question to be indexed into categories through a 10-point system. Results will be stratified into low, moderate, or high risk for nonadherence.

Conclusion: The creation of a tool to predict nonadherence prior to starting therapy is an unmet need for patients initiating oral oncolytics. The aim of this tool is to meet those needs and better guide clinicians to provide patients with strategies to better manage nonadherence. Next steps include tool validation and piloting in clinical practice.

口腔溶瘤不依从性估计器(ORACLE)的开发:口腔溶瘤药物预处理不依从性风险评估。
引言:到目前为止,还没有依从性评估器来确定在开始口服溶瘤药物之前不依从的风险。方法:通过国家社区肿瘤配药协会组建了一个工作组,负责创建一个工具来满足这一需求。工具结构是在对文献进行审查后确定的,确定了依从性的主要障碍。进行了第二次文献检索,以从经过验证的依从性问卷中确定针对特定障碍的问题。一旦最终草案完成,风险评估工具就被内置到电子调查中,可以自动计算患者的风险类别。结果:影响口服溶瘤药物依从性的六个最有影响的因素是患者的信心、健康素养、治疗感知、生活质量、社会支持和化疗方案的复杂性。创建了一份六项问卷,其中包括五个患者指导的问题和一个临床医生指导的问题。提供了示例和描述,供临床医生在对方案的复杂性进行分类时考虑。该工具旨在通过10分系统将每个问题的回答编入分类索引。结果将分为不依从性的低风险、中等风险或高风险。结论:对于开始口服溶瘤药物的患者来说,在开始治疗前创建一个预测不依从性的工具是一个未得到满足的需求。该工具的目的是满足这些需求,并更好地指导临床医生为患者提供更好地管理不依从性的策略。接下来的步骤包括工具验证和临床实践试点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信