Collective Administration of Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) inthe Light of the BSA Decision

Pavel Koukal
{"title":"Collective Administration of Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) inthe Light of the BSA Decision","authors":"Pavel Koukal","doi":"10.5817/MUJLT2016-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the author addresses the issue of collective\nadministration of graphical user interfaces according to the\nimpact of the CJEU decision in BSA v. Ministry of Culture on\nthe case-law in one of EU Member states (Czech Republic). The\nauthor analyses the decision of the Czech Supreme Court where\nthis Court concluded that visitors of Internet cafes use\ngraphical user interface actively, which represents relevant\nusage of a copyrighted works within the meaning of Art. 18 the\nCzech Copyright Act. In this paper, attention is first paid to\nthe definition of graphical user interface, its brief history\nand possible regimes of intellectual property protection.\nSubsequently, the author focuses on copyright protection of\ngraphical user interfaces in the Czech law and interprets the\nBSA decision from the perspective of collective administration\nof copyright. Although the graphical user interfaces are\nindependent objects of the copyright protection, if they are\nused while running the computer program the legal regulation of\ncomputer programs has priority. Based on conclusions reached by\nthe Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic in the\nBSA case, the author claims that collective administration of\ngraphical user interfaces is neither reasonable nor effective.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2016-2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper the author addresses the issue of collective administration of graphical user interfaces according to the impact of the CJEU decision in BSA v. Ministry of Culture on the case-law in one of EU Member states (Czech Republic). The author analyses the decision of the Czech Supreme Court where this Court concluded that visitors of Internet cafes use graphical user interface actively, which represents relevant usage of a copyrighted works within the meaning of Art. 18 the Czech Copyright Act. In this paper, attention is first paid to the definition of graphical user interface, its brief history and possible regimes of intellectual property protection. Subsequently, the author focuses on copyright protection of graphical user interfaces in the Czech law and interprets the BSA decision from the perspective of collective administration of copyright. Although the graphical user interfaces are independent objects of the copyright protection, if they are used while running the computer program the legal regulation of computer programs has priority. Based on conclusions reached by the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic in the BSA case, the author claims that collective administration of graphical user interfaces is neither reasonable nor effective.
根据BSA的决定,图形用户界面(GUI)的集体管理
在本文中,作者根据欧盟法院在BSA诉文化部一案中对欧盟成员国之一(捷克共和国)的判例法的影响,解决了图形用户界面的集体管理问题。作者分析了捷克最高法院的判决,该法院认为网吧的访问者积极使用图形用户界面,这代表了捷克版权法第18条意义上的版权作品的相关使用。本文首先介绍了图形用户界面的定义、它的发展简史以及可能的知识产权保护制度。随后,笔者着重分析了捷克法律对图形用户界面的著作权保护,并从著作权集体管理的角度对捷克版权法的判决进行了解读。尽管图形用户界面是独立的版权保护对象,但如果在运行计算机程序时使用图形用户界面,则对计算机程序的法律规定具有优先权。根据捷克共和国最高行政法院在bsa案中得出的结论,发件人声称图形用户界面的集体管理既不合理也不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信