TACITUS SE ANNALES I.1: 'N NARRATOLOGIESE ANALISE

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS
A. Kotzé
{"title":"TACITUS SE ANNALES I.1: 'N NARRATOLOGIESE ANALISE","authors":"A. Kotzé","doi":"10.7445/38-1-553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 INLEIDEND\nOat Tacitus se geskiedskrywing behoort tot 'n eiesoortige letterkundige genre wat optimaal\naan die hand van liter~re metodes ondersoek kan word, is 'n feit wat toenemend deur\nklassici as onomstrede aanvaar word. Opmerkings soos die deur Wellesley (1987:450) toon\negter dat die navorser wat Tacitus se Annales suiwer liter~r wil benader, steeds sy\ninvalshoek en werkwyse moet verdedig of ten minste duidelik moet omskryf:\nIt must be questioned whether at this date the purely literary critic\nsuch as Aubrion can contribute greatly to a better understanding\nof Tacitus as historian.\n(Wellesley 1987:450)","PeriodicalId":40864,"journal":{"name":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","volume":"6 1","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7445/38-1-553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 INLEIDEND Oat Tacitus se geskiedskrywing behoort tot 'n eiesoortige letterkundige genre wat optimaal aan die hand van liter~re metodes ondersoek kan word, is 'n feit wat toenemend deur klassici as onomstrede aanvaar word. Opmerkings soos die deur Wellesley (1987:450) toon egter dat die navorser wat Tacitus se Annales suiwer liter~r wil benader, steeds sy invalshoek en werkwyse moet verdedig of ten minste duidelik moet omskryf: It must be questioned whether at this date the purely literary critic such as Aubrion can contribute greatly to a better understanding of Tacitus as historian. (Wellesley 1987:450)
TACITUS IS ANNALES I.1:叙事分析
1 INLEIDENDOat Tacitus的历史应该是一种定制的字体类型,以优化升~ re方法,这是一个接受交互式半透明不稳定的因素。到目前为止,像奥布里翁这样纯粹的文学批评是否能对更好地理解塔西陀作为历史学家做出巨大贡献,这一点必须受到质疑。(韦尔斯利1987:450)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信