Higher Necessity

IF 0.3 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

IDEALISTIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5840/idstudies202061112

J. Noller

引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze Schelling’s compatibilist account of freedom of the will particularly in his Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom (1809). I shall argue that against Kant’s transcendental compatibilism Schelling proposes a “volitional compatibilism,” according to which the free will emerges out of nature and is not identical to practical reason as Kant claims. Finally, I will relate Schelling’s volitional compatibilism to more recent accounts of free will in order to better understand what he means by his concept of a “higher necessity.”

查看原文本刊更多论文

更高的必要性

本文的目的是分析谢林在《人类自由本质的哲学研究》(1809)中对意志自由的相容主义解释。我要论证的是，与康德的先验相容论相反，谢林提出了一种“意志相容论”，根据这种理论，自由意志来自于自然，并不像康德所说的那样等同于实践理性。最后，我将把谢林的意志相容论与最近对自由意志的解释联系起来，以便更好地理解他的“更高必然性”概念是什么意思。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

IDEALISTIC STUDIES PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Idealistic Studies provides a peer-reviewed forum for the discussion of themes and topics that relate to the tradition and legacy of philosophical Idealism. Established in 1971 as a vehicle for American Personalism and post-Kantian Idealism, the journal"s purview now includes historically earlier expressions, as well as the inheritance of that past in the developments of late 19th to mid-20th century philosophy. The journal has also become a venue for a number of philosophical movements that share Idealism in their genealogies, including Phenomenology, Neo-Kantianism, Historicism, Hermeneutics, Life Philosophy, Existentialism, and Pragmatism.