Der Einfluss von Hermann Andreas Pistorius auf Kants Argumentation im Paragrafen "Von dem Befugnisse der reinen Vernunft, im praktischen Gebrauche zu einer Erweiterung, die ihr im spekulativen für sich nicht möglich ist" in der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Philosophical Readings Pub Date : 2014-12-02 DOI:10.5281/zenodo.34554

Federica Basaglia

引用次数: 0

查看原文本刊更多论文

赫尔曼·皮斯托里乌斯对肯特论据的影响力，在段落，“理性的权力，在实践上的权力，在日常生活中，是无限的，但在实践上看来是不可能的扩大”，是对实践理性的批评

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.