Effect of manual therapy on pain, disability and neural mobility in patients of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc: a randomized controlled trial

Q3 Medicine
Varun Singh, M. Malik
{"title":"Effect of manual therapy on pain, disability and neural mobility in patients of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Varun Singh, M. Malik","doi":"10.5114/areh.2022.119699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a common health issue affecting young and middle-aged populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of manual therapy interventions on pain, disability, and neural mobility in lumbar PIVD patients. Material and methods: Eighty-eight participants were assigned to four groups (22 people in each group): Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) group, High-Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) thrust group, Neural Mobilization (NM) group and Control Treatment (CT) group. The outcomes measures, viz. changes in pain, disability, and straight leg raise range of motion (SLR ROM), were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of treatment, and after a six-week follow-up. Results: The greatest mean improvement was seen in the SMWLM group, with a VAS score of 6.05 ± 1.32, compared to the HVLA group (3.68 ± 0.75), NM group (3.2 ± 0.62) and CT group (1.91 ± 1.22), ODI score of 15.65 ± 2.43 compared to the HVLA group (11.89 ± 1.29), NM group (10.85 ± 1.53) and CT group (3.77 ± 2.43) and a SLR ROM score of 15.06 ± 3.1 compared to the HVLA group (7.89 ± 2.21), NM group (7.07 ± 2.58) and CT group (1.59 ± 2.58). Conclusions: SMWLM group showed the most significant mean change for visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SLR ROM compared to other groups. SMWLM may be a better viable choice in conservative management of lumbar PIVD.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.119699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a common health issue affecting young and middle-aged populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of manual therapy interventions on pain, disability, and neural mobility in lumbar PIVD patients. Material and methods: Eighty-eight participants were assigned to four groups (22 people in each group): Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) group, High-Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) thrust group, Neural Mobilization (NM) group and Control Treatment (CT) group. The outcomes measures, viz. changes in pain, disability, and straight leg raise range of motion (SLR ROM), were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of treatment, and after a six-week follow-up. Results: The greatest mean improvement was seen in the SMWLM group, with a VAS score of 6.05 ± 1.32, compared to the HVLA group (3.68 ± 0.75), NM group (3.2 ± 0.62) and CT group (1.91 ± 1.22), ODI score of 15.65 ± 2.43 compared to the HVLA group (11.89 ± 1.29), NM group (10.85 ± 1.53) and CT group (3.77 ± 2.43) and a SLR ROM score of 15.06 ± 3.1 compared to the HVLA group (7.89 ± 2.21), NM group (7.07 ± 2.58) and CT group (1.59 ± 2.58). Conclusions: SMWLM group showed the most significant mean change for visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SLR ROM compared to other groups. SMWLM may be a better viable choice in conservative management of lumbar PIVD.
手工疗法对腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛、残疾和神经活动的影响:一项随机对照试验
腰椎间盘突出症(PIVD)是一种影响中青年人群的常见健康问题。本研究的目的是确定手工治疗干预对腰椎PIVD患者疼痛、残疾和神经活动的影响。材料与方法:88名参与者被分为4组(每组22人):脊柱活动与腿部运动(SMWLM)组、高速低振幅(HVLA)推力组、神经活动(NM)组和对照治疗(CT)组。结果测量,即疼痛、残疾和直腿活动范围(SLR ROM)的变化,在基线、治疗四周后和随访六周后进行评估。结果:最大的提升意味着SMWLM集团脉管得分为6.05±1.32,相比HVLA组(3.68±0.75),纳米组(3.2±0.62)和CT组(1.91±1.22),ODI评分15.65±2.43相比HVLA组(11.89±1.29),纳米组(10.85±1.53)和CT组(3.77±2.43)和单反相比罗得分为15.06±3.1 HVLA组(7.89±2.21),纳米组(7.07±2.58)和CT组(1.59±2.58)。结论:SMWLM组视觉模拟量表、Oswestry残疾指数、SLR ROM的平均变化较其他组显著。在腰椎PIVD的保守治疗中,SMWLM可能是更好可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信