The Schoenus spikelet: a Rhipidium? A floral ontogenetic answer

Aliso Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.5642/ALISO.20072301.15
A. Vrijdaghs, P. Goetghebeur, E. Smets, P. Caris
{"title":"The Schoenus spikelet: a Rhipidium? A floral ontogenetic answer","authors":"A. Vrijdaghs, P. Goetghebeur, E. Smets, P. Caris","doi":"10.5642/ALISO.20072301.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inflorescence unit of Schoenus nigricans and S. ferrugineus consists of a zigzag axis and distichously arranged bracts, each of which may or may not subtend a bisexual flower. Each flower seems to terminate a lateral axis. These features have led to a controversy about the nature of the inflorescence unit, particularly whether it is monopodial or sympodial. It was often seen as a pseudospikelet composed of a succession of lateral axes, each subtended by the prophyll of the previous axis, as in a rhipidium. Many authors, however, consider the inflorescence units of all Cyperaceae to be indeterminate, racemose, actual spikelets. In our study, we present new SEM observations on the floral ontogeny of S. nigricans, corroborating a monopodial interpretation of the spikelet. Concaulescent growth of the flower primordium and the spikelet apex explains: (1) the presence of a peduncle under the flower, (2) the advanced development of the subtending glume compared to its own flower primordium, and (3) the position of the distal glume with regard to the distal flower primordium.","PeriodicalId":80410,"journal":{"name":"Aliso","volume":"23 1","pages":"204-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aliso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/ALISO.20072301.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The inflorescence unit of Schoenus nigricans and S. ferrugineus consists of a zigzag axis and distichously arranged bracts, each of which may or may not subtend a bisexual flower. Each flower seems to terminate a lateral axis. These features have led to a controversy about the nature of the inflorescence unit, particularly whether it is monopodial or sympodial. It was often seen as a pseudospikelet composed of a succession of lateral axes, each subtended by the prophyll of the previous axis, as in a rhipidium. Many authors, however, consider the inflorescence units of all Cyperaceae to be indeterminate, racemose, actual spikelets. In our study, we present new SEM observations on the floral ontogeny of S. nigricans, corroborating a monopodial interpretation of the spikelet. Concaulescent growth of the flower primordium and the spikelet apex explains: (1) the presence of a peduncle under the flower, (2) the advanced development of the subtending glume compared to its own flower primordium, and (3) the position of the distal glume with regard to the distal flower primordium.
松子属小穗:根属?花卉个体发育的答案
黑子花和铁子花的花序单位由锯齿形轴和排列整齐的苞片组成,每个苞片可以或不可以包含一朵两性花。每朵花似乎都有一个侧轴。这些特征引起了关于花序单位性质的争论,特别是它是单伏状还是合伏状。它通常被看作是由一系列的侧轴组成的假小穗,每一个都由前一轴的原叶所支撑,如在根茎中。然而,许多作者认为所有苏科的花序单位是不确定的,总状花序,实际的小穗。在我们的研究中,我们提出了新的扫描电镜观察到黑穗病的花的个体发生,证实了一个单足解释的小穗。花原基和小穗先端的会聚生长解释了:(1)花下有花序梗,(2)相对于其自己的花原基,相对于远端花原基,远端颖片发育较早,(3)远端花原基的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信