Effectiveness of ‘on demand’ silodosin in the treatment of premature ejaculation in patients dissatisfied with dapoxetine: a randomized control study

G. Bhat, A. Shastry
{"title":"Effectiveness of ‘on demand’ silodosin in the treatment of premature ejaculation in patients dissatisfied with dapoxetine: a randomized control study","authors":"G. Bhat, A. Shastry","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2016.843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Premature ejaculation is a common sexual disorder, which is usually underreported. Multiple treatment methodologies are in use due to the absence of an effective, universally acceptable treatment modality. The most common drug used is dapoxetine, which has adverse effects limiting its long-term use. Hence, we decided to evaluate the effectiveness of ‘on demand’ silidosin 4 mg in patients with premature ejaculation, who were dissatisfied with dapoxetine 30 mg. Material and methods The study included 64 patients who reported premature ejaculation who were unhappy with the treatment with ‘on demand’ dapoxetine 30 mg, either due to its adverse effects or because of its overall inefficacy. They were divided into two groups of 33 and 31 respectively by simple randomization, with Group A treated with ‘on demand’ silodosin 4 mg three hours prior to intercourse, whereas Group B was treated with placebo. Pre- and post-treatment intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), premature ejaculation profile (PEP) and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) for premature ejaculation were evaluated. Results Patients in Group A (silodosin 4 mg) reported statistically significant improvement (p <0.005) in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), premature ejaculation profile (PEP) and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) for premature ejaculation, with four patients reporting uncomfortably-delayed ejaculation. Conclusions ‘On demand’ silodosin 4 mg is an effective treatment option with very few adverse events in those patients suffering from premature ejaculation, who are dissatisfied with dapoxetine 30 mg due to its adverse effects or inefficacy.","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"69 1","pages":"280 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5173/ceju.2016.843","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction Premature ejaculation is a common sexual disorder, which is usually underreported. Multiple treatment methodologies are in use due to the absence of an effective, universally acceptable treatment modality. The most common drug used is dapoxetine, which has adverse effects limiting its long-term use. Hence, we decided to evaluate the effectiveness of ‘on demand’ silidosin 4 mg in patients with premature ejaculation, who were dissatisfied with dapoxetine 30 mg. Material and methods The study included 64 patients who reported premature ejaculation who were unhappy with the treatment with ‘on demand’ dapoxetine 30 mg, either due to its adverse effects or because of its overall inefficacy. They were divided into two groups of 33 and 31 respectively by simple randomization, with Group A treated with ‘on demand’ silodosin 4 mg three hours prior to intercourse, whereas Group B was treated with placebo. Pre- and post-treatment intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), premature ejaculation profile (PEP) and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) for premature ejaculation were evaluated. Results Patients in Group A (silodosin 4 mg) reported statistically significant improvement (p <0.005) in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), premature ejaculation profile (PEP) and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) for premature ejaculation, with four patients reporting uncomfortably-delayed ejaculation. Conclusions ‘On demand’ silodosin 4 mg is an effective treatment option with very few adverse events in those patients suffering from premature ejaculation, who are dissatisfied with dapoxetine 30 mg due to its adverse effects or inefficacy.
“按需”西洛多辛治疗达泊西汀不满意患者早泄的有效性:一项随机对照研究
早泄是一种常见的性障碍,通常被低估。由于缺乏一种有效的、普遍可接受的治疗方式,正在使用多种治疗方法。最常用的药物是达泊西汀,其副作用限制了其长期使用。因此,我们决定评估“按需”4毫克西立多辛对早泄患者的有效性,这些患者对30毫克达泊西汀不满意。材料和方法该研究包括64名报告早泄的患者,他们对“按需”达泊西汀30毫克的治疗不满意,要么是因为它的副作用,要么是因为它的整体无效。通过简单随机化,她们被分为两组,分别有33名和31名,A组在性交前3小时接受“按需”西洛多辛4毫克的治疗,而B组则接受安慰剂治疗。评估治疗前后阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)、早泄概况(PEP)和早泄临床总体印象变化(CGIC)。结果A组患者(西洛多辛4 mg)在阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)、早泄特征(PEP)和早泄临床总体印象变化(CGIC)方面均有统计学意义(p <0.005)的改善,其中4例患者报告不舒服的延迟射精。结论对于因达泊西汀30 mg不良反应或无效而不满意的早泄患者,“按需”西洛多辛4 mg是一种有效的治疗方案,不良事件极少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信